Teams

Kings Court - Hurricanes

Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 - 10.0 · 6.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-07vs Kings Court - HeatLost 02
L#2 DoublesOlivia Urrutia / Jacob Beacham vs Jeffery Wilson / Mahony Nathaly Agelvis Morales4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJose Leyva / Nakarid Melean vs Itunu Arojo / Neil Rubenstein4-6, 3-6
2026-05-31vs Kings Court - HeatLost 02
L#1 DoublesRamiro Balladares / Diana Jacoby vs CHARLES HILDEBRAND / Itunu Arojo4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNakarid Melean / Maylon Atchison vs Carissa Wilkerson / Nishchay Bharati2-6, 5-7
2026-05-24vs Kings Court - HeatLost 03
L#1 DoublesDiana Jacoby / Siva Maheswaran vs Neil Rubenstein / Mahony Nathaly Agelvis Morales2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChristopher Prescott / Liz Ehrhardt vs Jeffery Wilson / Meghan Ruble3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRamiro Balladares / Rosalie Sta Ana vs Safiya Atkinson / CHARLES HILDEBRAND0-6, 4-6
2026-05-17vs Kings Court - HeatLost 02
L#1 DoublesRosalie Sta Ana / Siva Maheswaran vs Denton Carman / Yunfan Tao3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChristopher Prescott / Liz Ehrhardt vs Peter Tran / Safiya Atkinson1-6, 2-6
2026-05-03vs Kings Court - HeatLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristopher Prescott / Liz Ehrhardt vs Joey DeFalco / Meghan Ruble3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJacob Beacham / Olivia Urrutia vs Mahony Nathaly Agelvis Morales / CHARLES HILDEBRAND1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJose Leyva / Mary Laflin vs Nishchay Bharati / Safiya Atkinson1-6, 3-6
2026-04-26vs Kings Court - HeatLost 03
L#1 DoublesDiana Jacoby / Ramiro Balladares vs Mahony Nathaly Agelvis Morales / Denton Carman2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLiz Ehrhardt / Jose Leyva vs Jeffery Wilson / Itunu Arojo1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesNakarid Melean / Maylon Atchison vs CHARLES HILDEBRAND / Safiya Atkinson2-6, 2-6
2026-04-19vs Kings Court - HeatLost 03
L#1 DoublesDiana Jacoby / Jacob Beacham vs Joey DeFalco / Mahony Nathaly Agelvis Morales1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChristopher Prescott / Liz Ehrhardt vs Nishchay Bharati / Carissa Wilkerson2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSiva Maheswaran / Olivia Urrutia vs Peter Tran / Yunfan Tao4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Kings Court - Heat70210299
2Kings Court - Hurricanes0702142252

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Diana Jacoby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Rosalie Sta Ana
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.89
Kat Creech
published
2.88
Esther Clover
published
2.81
Mary Laflin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Maylon Atchison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jacob Beacham
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jose Leyva
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Liz Ehrhardt
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Nakarid Melean
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Olivia Urrutia
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Ramiro Balladares
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Siva Maheswaran
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diana Jacoby
8W–12L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Rosalie Sta Ana
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
3.11
Kat Creech
1W–20L career · no lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.89
Esther Clover
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
Mary Laflin
6W–38L career · 1 line in 2026
91%9%<1%
2.81
Maylon Atchison
1W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
Jacob Beacham
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jose Leyva
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Liz Ehrhardt
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nakarid Melean
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Olivia Urrutia
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ramiro Balladares
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Siva Maheswaran
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.