Teams

Ma.Harris18S

2024 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-29vs As.Noble18SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKristen Patch vs Megan Black7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 SinglesGail Scoggin vs Stephanie Poley7-6, 6-4
2024-07-24vs El.Wallace18SLost 02
L#2 SinglesSally Highsmith vs Rebecca Geiger0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesGail Scoggin vs Elizabeth Schacht5-7, 2-6
2024-07-17vs St.Fogarty18S3.0Won 10
W#2 SinglesSheri Erhart vs Shannon Aumer6-2, 6-2
2024-06-26vs Ke.O'Rourke18SWon 10
W#3 SinglesSally Highsmith vs Sofia Switzer6-0, 6-0
2024-06-12vs Em.Best18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesSally Highsmith vs Kathryn Shields6-0, 6-1
2024-06-05vs Ba.Wilhelm18SLost 02
L#1 SinglesSally Highsmith vs Ellen Carey2-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesGail Scoggin vs Barbara Wilhelm1-6, 1-6
2024-05-22vs Je.Komes18SLost 01
L#3 SinglesKristen Patch vs Keshia Green1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Celeste Chapman
published 4
3.41
Sally Highsmith
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 30% · published 3.5
3.29
Chase Felmet
published 3.5
3.00
Lauren Bean
published
2.75
Kristen Patch
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
2.58
Sheri Erhart
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.56
MaryKate Harris
published
2.29
Gail Scoggin
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Patch + Sally Highsmith27567% games+6.7% vs expected
Sheri Erhart + Kristen Patch2350% gamesnot enough data
Gail Scoggin + Kristen Patch224 matchesnot enough data
Gail Scoggin + Sally Highsmith404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Celeste Chapman
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
4.04
3.5
Sally Highsmith
159W–46L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%74%25%
3.41
3.5
Chase Felmet
13W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Lauren Bean
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Kristen Patch
80W–63L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.75
3
Sheri Erhart
18W–26L career · 1 line in 2024
28%72%<1%
2.58
MaryKate Harris
0W–7L career · no lines in 2024
34%65%<1%
2.56
2.5
Gail Scoggin
63W–102L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%93%7%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.