Teams

Niggebrugge

2024 South East Tennis Singles 18 & Over League · 3.5 Men 18 & Over

6 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-02-28vs Powers CFCCWon 10
W#1 SinglesJordan Niggebrugge vs Walker Abney6-4, 6-3
2024-02-21vs Worman 3.5Won 20
W#1 SinglesBryan McCabe vs Keith Thomas6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJordan Niggebrugge vs Pahoran Dasilva6-4, 6-1
2024-02-17vs MatthewsWon 20
W#1 SinglesGuilherme Perez vs Anthony Martino6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesZachary Manfredi vs Kevin Cogan6-1, 6-0
2024-02-10vs Powers CFCCWon 10
W#3 SinglesBryan McCabe vs Ashley Garner6-0, 6-0
2024-02-07Won 10
W#1 SinglesGuilherme Perez vs Rob Hunoval6-3, 6-0
2024-01-31vs MatthewsWon 30
W#1 SinglesGuilherme Perez vs Randy Holleman6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesZachary Manfredi vs Chris Heller6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesJordan Niggebrugge vs Adrian Willis6-0, 6-0
2024-01-27Won 10
W#3 SinglesJordan Niggebrugge vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-01-27vs Worman 3.5Won 20
W#1 SinglesGuilherme Perez vs Keith Thomas3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJordan Niggebrugge vs David Baron6-2, 6-2
2024-01-13vs MatthewsWon 20
W#1 SinglesGuilherme Perez vs Brett Teeter6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesZachary Manfredi vs Bradley Matthews6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Jordan Niggebrugge
usually #3 Singles 44%, also #2 Singles 44% · published 4
3.90
Guilherme Perez
usually #1 Singles 64%, also #2 Singles 36% · published 4
3.82
Laurence Nadeau
published
3.81
Zachary Manfredi
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.77
Bryan McCabe
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.40
David McCabe
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jordan Niggebrugge + Guilherme Perez14559% games+2.9% vs expected
Bryan McCabe + Jordan Niggebrugge303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jordan Niggebrugge
200W–44L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%20%80%
4.12
4
Guilherme Perez
202W–73L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.90
Laurence Nadeau
22W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Zachary Manfredi
108W–51L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.81
4
Bryan McCabe
224W–121L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
3.5
David McCabe
24W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.