Teams

NITA S 50W18b Tam-Kitsuse/Ulbert

2024 NITA3 Summer Adult 18 & Over · NITA Summer Adult 18 & Over 5.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-07-20vs NITA S 50W18a Tam-Wright/NakamuraWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarija Jovicic / Marina Hermanny de Figueiredo vs Tomomi Nagao / Sarah Monteagudo6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKaitlin Ulbert vs Randi Wind6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGabriela Bobrowski / Grace Hahn vs Ayano Nakamura / Marialin Lomongo6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-06-30vs NITA S 50W18a Tam-Wright/NakamuraLost 01
L#1 DoublesGabriela Bobrowski / Bethany Lynch vs Tomomi Nagao / Susie Sorenson3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-06-21vs NITA S 50W18a Tam-Wright/NakamuraSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaitlin Ulbert / Nicole Kitsuse vs Megan Nguyen / Randi Wind1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarina Hermanny de Figueiredo / Claire Buehler vs Brittany Ballog / Susie Sorenson6-2, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · NITA Summer Adult 18 & Over 5.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA S 50W18a Tam-Wright/Nakamura3311717118
2NITA S 50W18b Tam-Kitsuse/Ulbert3371124143

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Claire Buehler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Bethany Lynch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
Kaitlin Ulbert
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Gabriela Bobrowski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Grace Hahn
published
Marija Jovicic
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Marina Hermanny de Figueiredo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Nicole Kitsuse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gabriela Bobrowski + Bethany Lynch224 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Kitsuse + Kaitlin Ulbert123 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Kitsuse + Gabriela Bobrowski213 matchesnot enough data
Kaitlin Ulbert + Claire Buehler033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Claire Buehler
115W–77L career · 1 line in 2024
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Bethany Lynch
11W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Kaitlin Ulbert
57W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%8%92%
4.19
Gabriela Bobrowski
18W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Grace Hahn
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marija Jovicic
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Marina Hermanny de Figueiredo
8W–0L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nicole Kitsuse
31W–11L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.