Teams

Naples Heritage / Hoffman

2025 Collier Adult 70 & over Winter · Adult 70 & over 3.5 -Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 DoublesJames Kushner / Harvey Wallace vs Lee Nagel / Jim Theodorow2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBartley Bull / Jim Watt vs Barry Ammons / Bruce Deger6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBruce Triden / Michael Hoffman vs Thomas Diehl / Gunther Schmiedl6-3, 6-1
W#1 DoublesJames Kushner / Harvey Wallace vs David Revette / Gerd Voelker6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBruce Triden / Kevin Duff vs Frank Beyer / Bruce Bailey0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJoe Bigham / Michael Hoffman vs Kurt Schwammle / Jim Manos3-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesJohn Storms / James Kushner vs Paul Bordeau / Eugene Demidenko6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBartley Bull / Charles Waters vs William Clark / Christopher Meyer3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHarvey Wallace / Bruce Triden vs James Murphy / Gunther Schmiedl2-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesJames Kushner / Charles Waters vs Wolfgang Koester / Bruce Bailey6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBartley Bull / Jim Watt vs Tom Folger / William Rayburn4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKevin Duff / Bruce Triden vs Frank Beyer / Kurt Schwammle1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 70 & over 3.5 -Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
John Storms
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
James Kushner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Charles Waters
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Michael Hoffman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Bruce Triden
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.03
Harvey Wallace
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jim Watt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kevin Duff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Paul Auger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Kushner + John Storms4447% games−4.3% vs expected
Bruce Triden + Harvey Wallace123 matchesnot enough data
Bruce Triden + Michael Hoffman303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Storms
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
James Kushner
7W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Charles Waters
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Michael Hoffman
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Bruce Triden
4W–5L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Harvey Wallace
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Jim Watt
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Duff
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Auger
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.