Teams

Fogleman 55s 7.5 Combo W Fri AM

2025 Piedmont Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Women 55 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesCatherine Tanner / Martha Fogleman vs Mary Batts / Nancy McNeill6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Spence / Toni Lewis vs Cheryl Bock / Theresa Atchison1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Jane Tarver / Katie Ballard vs Jan Whittaker / Julia Barnes2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 DoublesToni Lewis / Catherine Tanner vs Maria Pincus / Kathy Jones5-7, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMary Sexton / Martha Fogleman vs Christine Osteen / Debbie Thomas6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJulie Spence / Mary Jane Tarver vs Betty Kramer / Allison Waddell6-1, 6-3
L#1 DoublesTeresa Yokeley / Katie Ballard vs Judy Thomas / Annie Chapman4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Robinson / Teresa Tolin vs Lisa Cook / Stacey Dennehy6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Vary / Mary Jane Tarver vs Paige Yates / Lisa Liringis2-6, 6-7
2025-09-12vs Thornton 55s 7.5 Combo W Fri AMWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulie Spence / Toni Lewis vs Gwenda Priest / Mary Ann Nixon5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCatherine Tanner / Martha Fogleman vs Jane Davenport / Anne Thornton6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Sexton / Cheryl Scott vs Debbie Shiflet / Druid Michaels7-6, 6-4
W#1 DoublesTeresa Yokeley / Mary Jane Tarver vs Betty Kramer / Kimberly Salata5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Sexton / Martha Fogleman vs Kathy Jones / Tammy Pugh6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesTeresa Tolin / Laura Vary vs Debbie Burgess / Ann PORTER2-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesKaren Robinson / Teresa Tolin vs Paige Yates / Jennifer Dymek6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Spence / Debbie Clancy vs Tracey Weeks / Gracie Womack6-1, 6-1
2025-08-01vs Thornton 55s 7.5 Combo W Fri AMWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Robinson / Toni Lewis vs Debbie Shiflet / Jane Davenport6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTeresa Yokeley / Katie Ballard vs Mary Fowler / Nancy McCoy6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMary Sexton / Cheryl Scott vs Gwenda Priest / Janis Beshears6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Catherine Tanner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Karen Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.47
Julie Spence
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.46
Mary Jane Tarver
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.40
Mary Sexton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Debbie Clancy
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.32
Martha Fogleman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.30
Laura Vary
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Katie Ballard
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Teresa Tolin
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Toni Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Teresa Yokeley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Ballard + Martha Fogleman4359% games+10.1% vs expected
Martha Fogleman + Toni Lewis2451% games+7.0% vs expected
Julie Spence + Debbie Clancy224 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Tolin + Karen Robinson123 matchesnot enough data
Julie Spence + Toni Lewis213 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Tanner + Toni Lewis123 matchesnot enough data
Karen Robinson + Toni Lewis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Catherine Tanner
41W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Karen Robinson
13W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
Julie Spence
11W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.47
Mary Jane Tarver
20W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Mary Sexton
10W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
3.40
3.5
Debbie Clancy
32W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.38
Martha Fogleman
24W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Laura Vary
23W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.30
Katie Ballard
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Teresa Tolin
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.14
Toni Lewis
12W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
Teresa Yokeley
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.