Teams

TIC Orcutt

2024 OH OV FALL Combo Charleston · 8.5 Men Charleston

8 players · average NTRP 4.25 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-24vs OV Charleston Sutton (TIC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesGrayson Millette / Nickolas Williams vs Noah Fulks / Joshua Lawson6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesIan Woods / Thomas Orcutt vs Jason Prince / Jason Waybright2-6, 2-6
2024-11-04vs OV Charleston Sutton (TIC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesGrayson Millette / Ian Woods vs Noah Fulks / Jay Cooke4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Orcutt / Reid Bailey vs Christopher Ritchie / Matthew Sutton2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTanner Whipkey / Rico Williams vs Jason Waybright / Jaymes Haggerty2-6, 3-6
2024-10-19vs OV Charleston Sutton (TIC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesGrayson Millette / Tanner Whipkey vs Jaymes Haggerty / Roger Cooke6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRico Williams / Nickolas Williams vs Ryan Mullins / Jay Cooke1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesThomas Orcutt / Ryon Zent vs Noah Fulks / Brian Delcotto1-6, 1-6
2024-10-06vs OV Charleston Sutton (TIC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRico Williams / Shawn Bastin vs Ryan Mullins / Brian Delcotto1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesReid Bailey / Tanner Whipkey vs Jason Prince / Joseph Sinclair5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRyon Zent / Ian Woods vs Matthew Sutton / Christopher Ritchie0-6, 1-6
2024-09-21vs OV Charleston Sutton (TIC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesNickolas Williams / Ian Woods vs Ryan Mullins / Roger Cooke6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRyon Zent / Thomas Orcutt vs Matthew Sutton / Noah Fulks2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTanner Whipkey / Shawn Bastin vs Jason Prince / Joshua Lawson3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.5 Men Charleston
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OV Charleston Sutton (TIC)50150375
2TIC Orcutt0501530181

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Grayson Millette
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Ian Woods
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Tanner Whipkey
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Reid Bailey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rico Williams
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Ryon Zent
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Shawn Bastin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Thomas Orcutt
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Grayson Millette
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Ian Woods
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tanner Whipkey
57W–26L career · 7 lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.63
Reid Bailey
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rico Williams
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ryon Zent
15W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shawn Bastin
36W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Thomas Orcutt
42W–17L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.