Teams

Goy 7.5 Combo 18+ Thurs

2023 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 18 & Over Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-10-01vs Pretzsch 7.5 Combo 18s ThursWon 10
W#3 DoublesLynne Murray / Judiann Georgevich vs Anette Schmidt / Vangie Cruz6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLynne Murray / Judiann Georgevich vs Britt Flanagan / Micheala Amidon6-1, 6-4
2023-08-31vs Easley 7.5 Combo 18s ThursWon 10
W#3 DoublesLynne Murray / Judiann Georgevich vs Claire Parsons / Ginger Hayworth6-4, 6-3
2023-08-17vs Westrick 7.5 Combo 18+ ThursWon 10
W#3 DoublesLynne Murray / Kimberly Franz vs Melissa Goodman / Bobbie Westrick7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Sally Eagleton
published
3.89
Kristin Williamson
published
3.84
Cari Powell
published 4
3.74
Kelly Gekas
published
3.72
Kara Ray
published
3.71
Yukari Matsuoka
published
3.68
Lynne Murray
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.60
Gina Goy
published 4
3.53
Kimberly Franz
published
3.51
Kimberly Halsey
published
3.44
Judiann Georgevich
published
3.25
Lora Farlow
published
Sarah Stafford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chetana Honnarayanahalli + Gina Goy41142% games+3.9% vs expected
Chetana Honnarayanahalli + Judiann Georgevich5159% games+2.3% vs expected
Kimberly Halsey + Kimberly Franz8358% games+0.2% vs expected
Chetana Honnarayanahalli + Kristin Williamson5257% gamesnot enough data
Gina Goy + Judiann Georgevich4158% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Halsey + Judiann Georgevich314 matchesnot enough data
Kara Ray + Cari Powell314 matchesnot enough data
Cari Powell + Judiann Georgevich314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sally Eagleton
20W–10L career · no lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
3.95
Kristin Williamson
42W–35L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Cari Powell
34W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.84
Kelly Gekas
31W–14L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
Kara Ray
17W–9L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.72
Yukari Matsuoka
32W–22L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
Lynne Murray
164W–88L career · 8 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Gina Goy
34W–35L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.60
Kimberly Franz
41W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.53
Kimberly Halsey
59W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.51
Judiann Georgevich
36W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.44
4
Chetana Honnarayanahalli
30W–30L career · type A · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
3.43
Lora Farlow
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.25
Sarah Stafford
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.