Teams

FV:The Wildcats:Reese/Carlson

2026 NCT Adult 40 & Over Men · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Men 1

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-24vs FV:Point Breakers:Danielsen/BraunWon 21
L#1 DoublesErik Carlson / Nick Exarhos vs Paul Braun / John Scarfo4-6, 6-1, 4-6
W#1 SinglesRyan Reese vs Koustubh Karadkhedkar6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChristopher Kozey / John Crosson vs David Alkire / Luke Morosanu6-2, 6-3
2026-05-09vs FV:Aces:MoirWon 31
W#1 DoublesRyan Reese / Christopher Kozey vs Rafael Gonzalez / John Martin-Beaulieu6-1, 5-7, 6-1
L#1 SinglesErik Carlson vs Oleg Chubarev3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNick Exarhos / John Crosson vs Brian Ha / Anthony Krafft3-6, 6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMike Gambino / Karim Mabrouk vs Chad Moir / Marc Rousset6-7, 6-1, 6-4
2026-04-18vs FV:Point Breakers:Danielsen/BraunWon 31
L#1 DoublesErik Carlson / Karim Mabrouk vs Pavlos Papasavas / Matt Salzman2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesRyan Reese vs Gregory Jablonski6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChristopher Kozey / John Crosson vs John Scarfo / David Alkire6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKyle Johnson / Nick Exarhos vs Shridhar Prabhu / Yuming Wang5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2026-04-11vs FV:Point Breakers:Danielsen/BraunWon 21
L#1 DoublesErik Carlson / Vishal Hanjan vs Luke Morosanu / David Alkire6-3, 1-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRyan Reese vs Chris Hocevar6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChristopher Kozey / John Crosson vs John Danielsen / Paul Braun7-6, 7-5
2026-04-04vs FV:Point Breakers:Danielsen/BraunWon 31
W#1 DoublesRyan Reese / Nick Exarhos vs Charles Collin / Yuming Wang4-6, 7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesErik Carlson vs Thomas Frewen6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJohn Crosson / Kyle Johnson vs Matt Salzman / John Scarfo6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMike Gambino / Casey Abbott vs John Danielsen / Eric Strayer3-6, 6-3, 4-6
2026-03-28vs FV:Aces:MoirLost 12
W#1 DoublesRyan Reese / John Crosson vs Nicholas Gugliotti / John Martin-Beaulieu4-6, 6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKyle Johnson / Karim Mabrouk vs Wagner Filho / Rafael Gonzalez6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMike Gambino / Christopher Kozey vs Brian Ha / Marc Rousset1-6, 4-6
2026-03-21vs FV:Aces:MoirSplit 22
L#1 DoublesErik Carlson / John Crosson vs Neil Salesky / Rafael Gonzalez2-6, 7-5, 5-7
W#1 SinglesRyan Reese vs Nicholas Gugliotti6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCasey Abbott / William Ball vs Marc Rousset / John Martin-Beaulieu0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKyle Johnson / Christopher Kozey vs Chad Moir / Wagner Filho6-0, 6-1
2026-02-14vs FV:Aces:MoirWon 31
L#1 DoublesChristopher Kozey / Casey Abbott vs John Martin-Beaulieu / Rafael Gonzalez6-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesErik Carlson vs Brian Daring6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRyan Reese / William Ball vs Nicholas Gugliotti / Neil Salesky6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMike Gambino / Kyle Johnson vs Chad Moir / Wagner Filho6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FV:The Wildcats:Reese/Carlson08211128271
2FV:Point Breakers:Danielsen/Braun08141739325
3FV:Aces:Moir08112044366

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Ryan Reese
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #1 Singles 36% · published
3.02
John Crosson
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.01
Nick Exarhos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.78
Erik Carlson
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
2.77
Christopher Kozey
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.76
William Ball
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Mike Gambino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Karim Mabrouk
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Casey Abbott
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Vishal Hanjan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Kozey + John Crosson5258% games+7.0% vs expected
Christopher Kozey + Erik Carlson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryan Reese
23W–9L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
John Crosson
11W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
Nick Exarhos
9W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Erik Carlson
14W–21L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Christopher Kozey
9W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
William Ball
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
2.76
Mike Gambino
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Karim Mabrouk
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Casey Abbott
4W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Vishal Hanjan
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.