Teams

NWW-BAIN-Neupauer

2025 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0

2 players · average NTRP 4.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Dayna Guizzetti
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.80
Cheryl Farnham
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
Results8 ties
2025-08-02Won 10
W#3 DoublesRichard Alaniz / Dayna Guizzetti vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-26Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRichard Alaniz / Dayna Guizzetti vs John Follis / Kim Carey6-4, 6-2
2025-07-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesRichard Alaniz / Dayna Guizzetti vs Adam Sherr / Jamie Williams6-2, 6-3
2025-07-13Won 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Cattell / Cheryl Farnham vs Mary Digenan / Srish Sawkar6-3, 6-1
2025-07-12Won 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Cattell / Cheryl Farnham vs John Digenan / Ran Duan6-4, 7-6
2025-07-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesPaul Sullivan / Cheryl Farnham vs Rick Anderson / Holly Anderson6-3, 7-5
2025-06-28Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRoan Blacker / Cheryl Farnham vs Mick Jaeger / Shelley Chapman5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-14Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRichard Alaniz / Cheryl Farnham vs Thomas Ng / Nancy Chan6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Dayna Guizzetti
68W–19L career
1%99%1%
4.20
4
Cheryl Farnham
76W–162L career
0%99%1%
3.80

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.