Teams

Walnut Creek TC 18MX7.0C

2025 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX7.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-01vs PINOLE PK 18MX7.0AWon 30
W#1 DoublesNavi Dhillon / Siddharth Naik vs Cindy Mark / Hector Diaz6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTheresa Goodwin / Renato Castro vs Tracy Dennis / Ed Wong6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesZora Voss / Dang Do vs Maggie Celestini / Albert Chu6-4, 7-5
2025-01-26vs MORAGA VALLEY 18MX7.0AWon 21
L#1 DoublesDiana Babayan / Srikant Ramakrishnan vs Alex Kudlicki / Ben Sandler4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDeborah Gaisser / Dang Do vs Anne Myers / Kyle Steinpress6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesRobyn Schleifman / Sushil Rajendran vs Chrissy Schwinn / Rodrigo Almeida6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Siddharth Naik
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.65
Theresa Goodwin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.51
Rachel Falk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Navi Dhillon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Diana Babayan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Robyn Schleifman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Dang Do
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.41
Sushil Rajendran
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Renato Castro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Minh Cannon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Zora Voss
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Andrey Izmaylov
published 3.5
3.29
Prathiba Ramamurthy
published
3.27
James Tak
published 3.5
Deborah Gaisser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Srikant Ramakrishnan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Guru Prasad Acharya
published 3.5
2.93
Maria Chiang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Siddharth Naik + Navi Dhillon8163% games+5.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Siddharth Naik
14W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
Theresa Goodwin
57W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.65
Rachel Falk
17W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
Navi Dhillon
19W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Diana Babayan
26W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Robyn Schleifman
169W–123L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Dang Do
17W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.42
Sushil Rajendran
16W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
Renato Castro
12W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
Minh Cannon
61W–38L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Zora Voss
13W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Andrey Izmaylov
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Prathiba Ramamurthy
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
James Tak
11W–18L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Deborah Gaisser
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Srikant Ramakrishnan
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Guru Prasad Acharya
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Maria Chiang
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.