Teams

Sprague-Mid Court Crisis-Woodlands Parks

*2026 Adult 40 & Over 3.0 - 4.5 NoHo Women · Cancelled 4.5 Division

13 players · average NTRP 4.08 / TEXAS

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cancelled 4.5 Division have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Erica Sprague
published 4.5
4.01
Elizabeth Curry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.93
Brittany Pratt
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.88
Lindsay Dornier
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.81
Amy Howe
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.72
Christa Ellis
published 4
3.71
Susan Barnwell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.71
Dolores Cos
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Jill Cox
published
Karen Doss
published
Lea Squires
published
Martha Aucoin
published
Pamela Sommer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dolores Cos + Amy Howe3644% games−2.0% vs expected
Jill Cox + Susan Barnwell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Erica Sprague
15W–20L career · no lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
4.02
4
Elizabeth Curry
50W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Brittany Pratt
19W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
Lindsay Dornier
39W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Amy Howe
29W–23L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Christa Ellis
8W–0L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.72
Susan Barnwell
27W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Dolores Cos
30W–44L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.71
Jill Cox
15W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Karen Doss
7W–12L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lea Squires
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Martha Aucoin
7W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Pamela Sommer
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.