Teams

Terrell Mill (Ana Gonzalez)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 5.0 Women (Ann Aschenbrenner)

12 players · average NTRP 5.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesAna Gonzalez / Michelle Samson vs Aslesha Lissanevitch / Isabella Herrero0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Tullis / Elizabeth Menon vs Annelie Daneel / Ivona Grimberg5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Menon / Michelle Samson vs Maria Stand / Keyu Jin1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAlisa Price vs Isabella Herrero2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Tullis / Kelcie Pietz vs Katelyn Peterson / Kim Raley4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-01-17vs Bitsy Grant (Grace Pietkiewicz)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesAna Gonzalez / Alexandria Raffalovich vs Amanda Gautreaux / Neha Srivatsa6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMichelle Samson vs Addison Dodge6-7, 0-2
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Tullis / Elizabeth Menon vs Emilia Kali / Lindsay Glover1-6, 4-6
2025-12-06vs Bitsy Grant (Grace Pietkiewicz)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAna Gonzalez / Alexandria Raffalovich vs Neha Srivatsa / Amanda Gautreaux6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMichelle Samson vs Grace Pietkiewicz2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Tullis / Alisa Price vs Christina Ninci / Shinobu Koizumi Fawcett3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Menon / Alexandria Raffalovich vs Kim Raley / Clare Raley4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesShannon Tooley / Allison Damico vs Julie Fusik / Ivona Grimberg1-6, 2-6
2025-11-08vs Bitsy Grant (Grace Pietkiewicz)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Tullis / Allison Damico vs Amy Dozier / Emilia Kali1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMichelle Samson vs Shinobu Koizumi Fawcett6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Menon / Shannon Tooley vs Lindsay Glover / Christina Ninci6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Women (Ann Aschenbrenner) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.47 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Allison Damico
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.69
Alexandria Raffalovich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.69
Michelle Samson
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
4.63
Mihaela Johnson
published
4.55
Shannon Tooley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.50
Ana Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.50
Elizabeth Menon
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
4.48
Alisa Price
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.47
Kelcie Pietz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.46
Elizabeth Tullis
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
4.29
Omotayo Adeshigbin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.88
Mercedes Figueroa
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Tullis + Elizabeth Menon224 matchesnot enough data
Ana Gonzalez + Elizabeth Tullis213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Allison Damico
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
5
Alexandria Raffalovich
12W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.69
Michelle Samson
7W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.69
Mihaela Johnson
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.63
Shannon Tooley
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.55
5
Ana Gonzalez
22W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.50
Elizabeth Menon
8W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.50
5
Alisa Price
24W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.48
Kelcie Pietz
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.47
Elizabeth Tullis
8W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
4.46
Omotayo Adeshigbin
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
4.29
Mercedes Figueroa
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
3.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.