Teams

Varner, Chris

2026 Combo 18 & Over-JXN · Men 6.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-11vs Youngblood, BradLost 03
L#1 DoublesJulio Morales / Tyler Lantz vs Adam Byrd / Weber Herbison1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJohn Patton / Michael Gordon vs Alex Alexander / Abram Diaz3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesWinston Lee / Joseph Dendy vs Brendon Mcleod / Christian Medina7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2026-08-04vs Pullen, JacksonLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulio Morales / Wes Price vs Riley Bennett / John Stowers3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Gordon / John Patton vs Ray Jost / Collin Kozielski2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChris Varner / Joseph Dendy vs Jackson Pullen / Bradley Thomas5-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Men 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Youngblood, Brad2060251
2Bailey, Ben2154873
3Pullen, Jackson1133761
4Varner, Chris02151176

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
John Patton
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Winston Lee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Julio Morales
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Joseph Dendy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Wes Price
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.72
Tyler Lantz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Michael Barnard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Chris Varner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Barnard + Tyler Lantz213 matchesnot enough data
Chris Varner + Christopher Thompson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Patton
66W–37L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
3.37
Winston Lee
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
3.29
Julio Morales
50W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
Joseph Dendy
34W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.98
Wes Price
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
Tyler Lantz
20W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.72
Michael Barnard
16W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Chris Varner
7W–11L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
15%85%<1%
2.64
3
Christopher Thompson
4W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.