Teams

Murdock/LR/Reb

2026 Combo 18 & Over 5.5, 7.5, 9.5 · 7.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-09-01vs Yeatts/LR/BPLost 12
L#1 DoublesHannah Heffernan / Erika Johnson vs MacKenzie Simon / Kelsy Knox2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichele Stearns / Natalie Rockefeller vs Emily Keathley / Kara Oko2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMaria Olmos / Sarah Declerk vs Jennifer Quilao / Madeline Donahue6-1, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Molly Murdock
published
3.51
Michele Stearns
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Natalie Rockefeller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Erika Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Amy Rainey
published 3.5
3.18
Molly Telford
published
3.16
Sarah Declerk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Kelly Lasseigne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Telford + Natalie Rockefeller6060% games+10.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Molly Murdock
28W–19L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
Michele Stearns
12W–33L career · 1 line in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.51
Natalie Rockefeller
44W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Erika Johnson
44W–37L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Amy Rainey
26W–30L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
Molly Telford
30W–29L career · no lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.18
Sarah Declerk
21W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.16
Kelly Lasseigne
5W–11L career · no lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.