Teams

EFultz 40+

2022 Cap Spring USTA 40 & over · 3.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-05-18vs BPlemmons 40+ 3.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesBen Williams / Les Murray vs Carl Anthony / Michael Benecky6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEvan Fultz / Donald Corey vs Christopher Winter / Ed Martin6-0, 6-0
2022-05-11Lost 01
L#1 SinglesEvan Fultz vs Kevin Johnston6-7, 2-6
2022-05-04vs JHoomani40Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBen Williams / Donald Corey vs Jeff Abercrombie / Scott Walton3-6, 0-6
2022-04-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesEvan Fultz / Steve Crell vs David Shuman / Thomas Milici7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2022-04-20vs GChristopherWon 10
W#2 DoublesEvan Fultz / Brian Ross vs Thomas Sewitsky / Richard Johnson6-3, 6-3
2022-04-08vs JHoomani40Split 11
W#1 SinglesEvan Fultz vs Weston Norris6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLes Murray / Ben Williams vs James Coblentz / Gregory Beyer0-6, 2-6
2022-04-08vs MGentryLost 01
L#1 DoublesEvan Fultz / Les Murray vs Robert Rauth / Jay Williams6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-04-06vs BPlemmons 40+ 3.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesEvan Fultz / Don Kranbuehl vs Carl Anthony / Christopher Winter6-3, 6-2
2022-03-27Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrian Ross / Evan Fultz vs Michael Lewis / James Kriete6-1, 6-3
2022-03-20vs GChristopherLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrian Ross / Les Murray vs Greg Christopher / Richard Johnson6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDonald Corey / John Stephens vs Todd Sprouse / Matthew Fitzsimmons3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Evan Fultz
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
3.16
Patrick Graney
published
3.06
Steve Crell
published
3.06
Brian Ross
published 3
2.65
Les Murray
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.56
Donald Corey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Les Murray + Donald Corey3352% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Evan Fultz
115W–110L career · 11 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Patrick Graney
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
Steve Crell
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.06
3
Brian Ross
32W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
3.06
3
Les Murray
50W–73L career · 8 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
2.65
3
Donald Corey
23W–27L career · 3 lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.