Teams

Leon - Beggs (Forestmeadows)

2023 Leon Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-18vs Herring (Forestmeadows)Won 20
W#1 DoublesKim Thriffiley / Susan Goodwin vs Mary Warner / Lisa Graganella6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesStacy Chick / Michelle Eubanks vs Jennifer Winegardner / Mydieu Nguyen6-4, 6-4
2023-03-04vs Herring (Forestmeadows)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKim Thriffiley / Susan Goodwin vs Joni MacRi / Brenda Jahn6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-02-25vs Herring (Forestmeadows)Won 21
L#1 DoublesKim Thriffiley / Susan Goodwin vs Joni MacRi / Brenda Jahn3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Franson / Kathy Beggs vs Margaret Stephens / Lisa Graganella4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStacy Chick / Michelle Eubanks vs Gina Herring / Tracy Propp6-2, 6-1
2023-02-18vs Herring (Forestmeadows)Split 11
L#1 DoublesSusan Goodwin / Kim Thriffiley vs Margaret Stephens / Mary Warner3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKathy Beggs / Elizabeth Hawkins vs Joan Bassett / Jennifer Winegardner6-4, 6-4
2023-02-04vs Herring (Forestmeadows)Won 20
W#1 DoublesKim Thriffiley / Susan Goodwin vs Joan Bassett / Sherry Cady6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesStacy Chick / Michelle Eubanks vs Jennifer Winegardner / Mydieu Nguyen6-1, 6-3
2023-01-28vs Herring (Forestmeadows)Won 20
W#2 DoublesKim Thriffiley / Susan Goodwin vs Mydieu Nguyen / Gina Herring6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKathy Beggs / Elizabeth Hawkins vs Joan Bassett / Lisa Graganella3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Kathy Beggs
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.66
Michelle Eubanks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Stacy Chick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Lisa Franson
published
3.50
Kim Thriffiley
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.42
Susan Goodwin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Chick + Michelle Eubanks432852% games−6.2% vs expected
Michelle Eubanks + Kim Thriffiley2351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathy Beggs
55W–60L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Michelle Eubanks
157W–99L career · 3 lines in 2023
13%87%1%
3.66
4
Stacy Chick
59W–50L career · 3 lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.63
Lisa Franson
18W–17L career · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.60
Kim Thriffiley
144W–202L career · 6 lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
Susan Goodwin
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%27%
3.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.