Teams

EKennard (Park Road)

2023 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-08-02vs LDiFazio (Queens)Won 20
W#1 SinglesCynthia Hoover vs Katherine Koppel-Dobbs6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesNicole Badr vs Nicole Brown2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-07-12Won 20
W#1 SinglesCynthia Hoover vs Caitlin Steele6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesNicole Badr vs Katie Hilborn6-4, 6-4
2023-07-05vs RJoplin (Queens)Won 10
W#3 SinglesKimberly Rupnarine vs Carrie Letorney6-1, 6-0
2023-06-28vs LDiFazio (Queens)Won 20
W#1 SinglesCynthia Hoover vs Katherine Koppel-Dobbs2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesNicole Badr vs Lori DiFazio7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2023-06-14vs JDerrico (BCC)Won 10
W#3 SinglesKimberly Rupnarine vs Julie Derrico7-5, 6-2
2023-06-07vs CSteele (Queens)Won 20
W#1 SinglesCynthia Hoover vs Katie Hilborn6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesNicole Badr vs Thalia Allen6-0, 6-0
2023-05-31vs RJoplin (Queens)Split 11
W#1 SinglesCynthia Hoover vs Palak Merchant7-5, 6-2
L#2 SinglesKimberly Rupnarine vs Lindsay Smith1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Emily McEwen
published 4
3.69
Cynthia Hoover
usually #1 Singles 93%, also #2 Singles 7% · published 3.5
3.69
Marissa Kleber
published
3.65
Kimberly Rupnarine
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.54
Laura Grant
published
3.45
Elizabeth Kennard
published 3.5
2.87
Nicole Badr
usually #3 Singles 86%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Hoover + Nicole Badr8757% games+4.0% vs expected
Laura Grant + Marissa Kleber2451% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emily McEwen
20W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
3.5
Cynthia Hoover
303W–124L career · 14 lines in 2023
<1%7%93%
3.69
Marissa Kleber
14W–15L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Kimberly Rupnarine
100W–31L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%12%88%
3.65
Laura Grant
36W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Elizabeth Kennard
27W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.45
3
Nicole Badr
95W–87L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
2.87
Mary Rebecca Harakas
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.