Teams

XYs

2021 18&Over Mixed · 6.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-04-11vs Syr: Geary-DrumlinsLost 01
L#1 DoublesJason Beland / Alison Brzenchek vs Isaac Lartey / Emily Vacher1-6, 2-6
2021-02-21Lost 01
L#3 DoublesValerie Clarke / Jason Beland vs Ashley Hayes / William Murray3-6, 2-6
2021-01-29Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJason Beland / Andrea Elliott vs Ashley Hayes / William Murray7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Syr: Geary-Drumlins6215924217
2XYs35101431237

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Richard Ingraham
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.47
Amro Mohamed
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.45
Michele Kellish
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Donna Hack
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Heidi Howard
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Andrea Elliott
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Alison Brzenchek
published 3.5
2.91
Valerie Clarke
usually #3 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
2.82
Philip Luckette
published
2.75
Jack Clarkson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Bernie McGee
published
Jason Beland
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Howard + Richard Ingraham5164% gamesnot enough data
Donna Hack + Richard Ingraham303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Richard Ingraham
134W–41L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%16%84%
3.63
3.5
Amro Mohamed
30W–12L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%59%41%
3.47
Michele Kellish
21W–6L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Donna Hack
101W–63L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Heidi Howard
101W–67L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Andrea Elliott
73W–59L career · 3 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Alison Brzenchek
20W–25L career · no lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.14
Valerie Clarke
71W–74L career · 9 lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
2.91
Philip Luckette
16W–26L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.82
3.5
Jack Clarkson
1W–12L career · type S · 3 lines in 2021
97%3%<1%
2.75
Bernie McGee
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jason Beland
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.