Teams

BP RED

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 4.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-15vs KC-CC REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesIrene Arguelles / Denise Hernandez vs Meghan Geisler / Shannon Kiebler2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDori Webb vs Radhika Acharya-Leon7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMeg Staebell / Mary Nelson vs Debbie Lathrop / Susan McGarry1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesYukiko Brooks / Rosemary Garcia vs Jodi Thomas / Phyllis Glawe7-6, 6-4
2025-07-08vs JCC BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesAnne Torkelson / Mary Nelson vs Clare Morey / Julie Lang2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDori Webb vs Amy Kaufman7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesIrene Arguelles / Denise Hernandez vs Christine Hong / Juana Donald7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLeslie Lane / Andrea Philleo vs Khanh Huyen / Rachael Costain6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-07-01vs WP GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesRosemary Garcia / Anne Torkelson vs Michelle Miller / Audrey Davine2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDenise Hernandez / Mary Nelson vs Kristen Tourangeau / Julia Bridgewater5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesYukiko Brooks / Andrea Philleo vs Victoria Barstow / Jennifer Mele4-6, 0-6
2025-06-24vs SS-LGT BLUELost 13
W#1 DoublesLeslie Lane / Meg Staebell vs Rebecca Martin / Ankie Richard6-0, 7-6
L#1 SinglesAndrea Philleo vs Julie Clapham0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDenise Hernandez / Irene Arguelles vs Jordan Campbell / Anne Quallick4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMary Nelson / Rosemary Garcia vs Kaitlyn Bridgers / Natalia Isabel Camera Perez0-6, 1-6
2025-06-11vs CACM NAVYLost 13
W#1 DoublesLeslie Lane / Meg Staebell vs Rachel Heise / Irene Mendelsberg6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesDori Webb vs Michelle Degitis1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Torkelson / Rosemary Garcia vs Carlie Odau / Tonya Laden2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDenise Hernandez / Irene Arguelles vs NATALIE KOONTZ / Shelly Jones5-7, 3-6
2025-06-03vs LTC-M NAVYWon 40
W#1 DoublesLeslie Lane / Rosemary Garcia vs Shellie Hall / Tiffany Hall6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDori Webb vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMeg Staebell / Anne Torkelson vs Jenna Marvin / Lisa Robinson6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAndrea Philleo / Irene Arguelles vs Karen Payne / Heather Ringelman6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anne Torkelson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.18
Meg Staebell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.17
Leslie Lane
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.14
Denise Hernandez
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.08
Rosemary Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
4.08
Andrea Philleo
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
3.94
Yukiko Brooks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
Dori Webb
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.73
Mary Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Irene Arguelles
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yukiko Brooks + Dori Webb6162% games+10.8% vs expected
Meg Staebell + Leslie Lane10358% games+8.4% vs expected
Rosemary Garcia + Andrea Philleo2346% games−0.5% vs expected
Rosemary Garcia + Yukiko Brooks3846% games−1.4% vs expected
Andrea Philleo + Meg Staebell2442% games−6.1% vs expected
Denise Hernandez + Irene Arguelles3745% games−8.8% vs expected
Andrea Philleo + Yukiko Brooks2634% games−16.1% vs expected
Rosemary Garcia + Anne Torkelson2343% games−19.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anne Torkelson
8W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Meg Staebell
71W–49L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
Leslie Lane
29W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
4.17
4.5
Denise Hernandez
14W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
4.14
Rosemary Garcia
9W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.08
4.5
Andrea Philleo
52W–75L career · 4 lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
4.08
4
Yukiko Brooks
145W–118L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Dori Webb
122W–55L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
Mary Nelson
29W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Irene Arguelles
4W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.