Teams

DWest (Park Road)

2023 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 5.0 Women - Sat PM

9 players · average NTRP 4.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-06vs MLewis (Park Crossing)Split 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Holshouser / Kindell Schmitt vs Melanie Lewis / Michelle Alexander Hovey7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJaclyn Rock / Meredith Propeck vs Samantha Danesis / Elizabeth Schrand2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-05-05vs JAlexander (Park Road Park)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKindell Schmitt vs Juliana Marques3-6, 2-6
2023-04-15Lost 01
L#2 DoublesShreyaa Mukund / Kindell Schmitt vs Natalie Osman / Kirby Crotts4-6, 5-7
2023-04-12vs JAlexander (Park Road Park)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDebbie Miller / Jaclyn Rock vs Lauren Laughton / MacKenzie King3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKindell Schmitt vs Callie Schmit7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-03-18vs MLewis (Park Crossing)Won 10
W#2 DoublesKindell Schmitt / Jaclyn Rock vs Michelle Alexander Hovey / Elizabeth Schrand6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-03-09vs MLewis (Park Crossing)Split 11
L#1 DoublesKindell Schmitt / Jennifer Holshouser vs Natalie Osman / Samantha Danesis5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDiana West / Jaclyn Rock vs MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY / Melanie Lewis6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2023-03-04vs JAlexander (Park Road Park)Won 10
W#1 SinglesKindell Schmitt vs Laine Parker Horvath6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 5.0 Women - Sat PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.34 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.65
Kindell Schmitt
usually #2 Doubles 31%, also #1 Singles 23% · published 5
4.53
Jennifer Holshouser
published
4.35
Jaclyn Rock
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.28
Diana West
published 4.5
4.16
Salem Kirven
published
4.07
Debbie Miller
published 4.5
Kimberly Hanson
published
Meredith Propeck
published
Tempie Largen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana West + Kindell Schmitt303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Kindell Schmitt
118W–40L career · 13 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
4.65
Jennifer Holshouser
10W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
4.53
4.5
Jaclyn Rock
51W–23L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
4.35
4.5
Diana West
34W–22L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
4.28
Salem Kirven
6W–0L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Debbie Miller
12W–4L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
4.07
Kimberly Hanson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Meredith Propeck
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tempie Largen
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.