Teams

WEY:Weymouth Blue:Jenney/Sisk

2025 EMA Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-16vs SSY:SSYMCA Green:CloudLost 14
L#1 DoublesBianca Barinas Bradford / Katie Rayburn vs Diana Terranova / Kristina Carr4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAmanda Shalian vs Sarah Cloud3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesErin Sisk / Lisa Jenney vs Danielle Boretti / Ann LeDang Sheehan3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesNatalie Logan vs Lisa Bishop6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAlexandra Zais / Bobbi King vs Joanne Riley / Alexandra Ford1-6, 2-6
2025-07-03vs SSY:GAME SET POUR:Cuesta/MarianoLost 14
W#1 DoublesBianca Barinas Bradford / Katie Rayburn vs Karen DeCoste / Maryam Khadivi3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAmanda Shalian vs Caryn Stevens0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNatalie Logan / Erin Sisk vs Elizabeth Brown / Kelly Arevian7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesViolet Lam vs Amy Conley4-6, 3-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBobbi King / Dianne Bell vs KATHI CUESTA / Tisha Petersen0-6, 1-6
2025-06-25vs LAK:Lakeville:Bonito/DiPalmaWon 32
L#1 DoublesBianca Barinas Bradford / Katie Rayburn vs Maura Leddy / Trudy Wallach4-6, 4-5
W#1 SinglesAmanda Shalian vs Melissa Prag3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTracey Doherty / Laura Taylor vs Maureen Gilbert / Catherine Melville3-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesNatalie Logan vs Sydney Santos6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBobbi King / Erin Sisk vs Felicia Stover / Lisa Tiraboschi6-4, 7-5
2025-06-18vs ADI:Adirondack Blue:GaudetWon 50
W#1 DoublesBianca Barinas Bradford / Katie Rayburn vs Melanie Walsh / Kerri Kelley6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAmanda Shalian vs Jennifer Wood6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDianne Bell / Bobbi King vs Holly Salzillo / Lisa Lentini-Haskell6-4, 6-0
W#2 SinglesNatalie Logan vs Kate Eskine6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Taylor / Tracey Doherty vs Hilary Gaudet / Kristin ODonnell6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-11vs SSY:SSYMCA Green:CloudLost 23
W#1 DoublesBianca Barinas Bradford / Katie Rayburn vs Joanne Riley / Melinda Hawkes2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAlexandra Zais vs Christina Ladd6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Jenney / Amanda Shalian vs Kristina Carr / Diana Terranova5-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesViolet Lam vs Robin Tam2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNatalie Logan / Dianne Bell vs Lisa Bishop / Ann LeDang Sheehan4-6, 1-6
2025-05-28vs SSY:GAME SET POUR:Cuesta/MarianoLost 23
L#1 DoublesErin Sisk / Lisa Jenney vs Caryn Stevens / Maryam Khadivi2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAmanda Shalian vs Abigail Mariano6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarcy McGourty / Tracey Doherty vs KATHI CUESTA / Elizabeth Brown6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNatalie Logan vs Melissa DeSchamp6-7, 4-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKatie Rayburn / Bobbi King vs Beth Smith / Kristin Sherman3-6, 0-6
2025-05-21vs LAK:Lakeville:Bonito/DiPalmaWon 50
W#1 DoublesKatie Rayburn / Bianca Barinas Bradford vs Sydney Santos / Waldron Schultz6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAlexandra Zais vs Melissa Prag6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTracey Doherty / Laura Taylor vs Trudy Wallach / Lisa DiPalma6-7, 6-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAmanda Shalian vs Maura Leddy6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMarcy McGourty / Erin Sisk vs Ruth Iampietro / Susan Tripp6-4, 6-3
2025-05-14vs ADI:Adirondack Blue:GaudetWon 21
W#1 DoublesBianca Barinas Bradford / Katie Rayburn vs Kate Eskine / Melanie Walsh6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesBarbara Madrid vs Jennifer Wood1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesAmanda Shalian vs Sara Allegretti7-6, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings30 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SSY:GAME SET POUR:Cuesta/Mariano08301029272
2SSY:SSYMCA Green:Cloud08271331307
3WEY:Weymouth Blue:Jenney/Sisk08231743332
4ADI:Adirondack Blue:Gaudet08122861422
5LAK:Lakeville:Bonito/DiPalma0883267429
6WESF:Westfit:Warren/Lee0940518235
7NETC:New England TC:Pellakuru/Chase09261949382
8SHR:What the Deuce:Cherian/Canepa09222351398
9WESB:Westboro:Kraft/Cassy0924386507
10CED:Cedardale Kicking Aces:Cavallini010401028357
11SFT:Spark White:Sideman/Moon010351536354
12BRTC:Racket Rebels:Parrelli/Godfrin-Ruiz010351537374
13COH:Cohasset:Maggi/Kahn010361439373
14LFNT:Natick Netmasters: Spetter/Nilamsari010331742376
15BRTC:The Notorious NFG:Bradley010331747435
16DED:Dedham Health:Ahmadi/Cocoros010302050395
17IRCC:Indian Ridge Green:Edelmann/Evans010272353456
18SFT:Spark Blue:Andrews010262453402
19STC:Sportsmen's Smashers: Pouchak/Tonning010272357455
20SRF:Scituate Red:Horne010232760468
21LFW:Longfellow:Ackerley010193162461
22NEW:Violet Femmes:Daley/Marsh010193164466
23CGC:CGC Green:Bridge/Moscardelli010222864461
24LFW:Wayland:Lydon010232766471
25WAC:Waltham:Lisanke/Rathnasamy010173368482
26CGC:CGC Blue:Ryan/Pinard010183268494
27BRTC:Pink Flamingos:Morris010163474509
28BRCC:Black Rock:Fine/Ra010163475519
29BRTC:Red Team:Chasse/Glidden01094184539
30CED:Summer Fun:Nugent01054591557

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Katie Rayburn
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.88
Natalie Logan
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #2 Singles 39% · published
2.77
Bianca Barinas Bradford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Violet Lam
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.76
Erin Sisk
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Alexandra Zais
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Amanda Shalian
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
Dianne Bell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Bobbi King
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.58
Lisa Jenney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.50
Barbara Madrid
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Marcy McGourty
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Tracey Doherty
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Sisk + Lisa Jenney101046% games−3.1% vs expected
Bianca Barinas Bradford + Katie Rayburn10356% games−6.9% vs expected
Lisa Jenney + Bianca Barinas Bradford4259% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Rayburn
25W–24L career · 15 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Natalie Logan
15W–11L career · 13 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Bianca Barinas Bradford
22W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Violet Lam
11W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Erin Sisk
17W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Alexandra Zais
12W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Amanda Shalian
8W–10L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Dianne Bell
10W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Bobbi King
8W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.69
Lisa Jenney
21W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Barbara Madrid
4W–8L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.50
Marcy McGourty
14W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracey Doherty
19W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.