Teams

CHCC YELLOW

2023 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-10vs GCC GOLDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAdrine Writer / Wendy Croney vs Kory Fasing / Lisa Adams6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMarcy White / Lauren Markel vs Betsy Phillips / Alicia Weaver6-7, 2-6
2023-08-02vs PTC GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Pavlakis / Adrine Writer vs Elizabeth Leutwyler / Karen Wilson2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-07-27vs PH SILVERWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnita Burns / Adrine Writer vs Melodie Harris / Michelle Campbell6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2023-07-06vs CM VIOLETSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKatie Reed / Adrine Writer vs Elissa Sungar / Deborah Bashleben6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMarcy White vs Amy Newman1-6, 3-6
2023-06-29vs LTFC BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesAdrine Writer / Kelly Osborn vs Heidi Elliott / Ashley Gonzales6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Emily Cunningham
published
3.79
Katie Reed
published
3.72
Anita Burns
published 4
3.70
Adrine Writer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.65
Kelly Osborn
published
3.59
Maureen Kechriotis
published
3.53
Stephanie Stewart
published
3.43
Wendy Croney
published
3.38
Lisa Pavlakis
published
3.21
Marcy White
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adrine Writer + Kelly Osborn9656% games+1.7% vs expected
Katie Reed + Emily Cunningham15755% games−0.7% vs expected
Wendy Croney + Lisa Pavlakis0735% games−9.0% vs expected
Wendy Croney + Adrine Writer224 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Croney + Kelly Osborn123 matchesnot enough data
Katie Reed + Adrine Writer303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Cunningham
16W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
Katie Reed
20W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Anita Burns
22W–15L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Adrine Writer
86W–61L career · 5 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.70
Kelly Osborn
18W–14L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.65
Maureen Kechriotis
6W–16L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.59
Stephanie Stewart
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.53
Wendy Croney
5W–21L career · no lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
3.43
Lisa Pavlakis
1W–17L career · no lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
3.38
3.5
Marcy White
61W–95L career · 2 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.