Teams

Huguenot - Radel

2025 Duval Combo 18 & Over - Spring Weeknight · 7.5 Men (Wednesdays)

13 players · average NTRP 3.81 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-06vs Club Continental - AldenWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrew de Jong / Jowell Olson vs Sean Buckley / Alex Nixon5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-07-30vs Marsh Creek - TempletonWon 10
W#2 DoublesChris Neblett / Carl Cline vs Gary Holub / Jim Choulas6-2, 6-2
2025-06-25vs Baymeadows - GordonLost 01
L#2 DoublesTony Hennies / Mark Cabler vs Dmitri Timofeev / Eric Dawson4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-06-18vs Marsh Creek - TempletonWon 10
W#1 DoublesTony Hennies / Mark Cabler vs Shawn Templeton / Thomas Kayworth6-3, 7-5
2025-06-11vs Baymeadows - GordonSplit 11
L#2 DoublesBrian McIntire / Jowell Olson vs Dmitri Timofeev / Srikanth Bikkavilli4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChris Neblett / Greg Burley vs Karu Choudhary / Rommel Marson7-6, 7-5
2025-05-21vs Club Continental - AldenLost 02
L#1 DoublesChris Neblett / Adam McKenry vs Adam Rutstein / Finley Williams0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTony Hennies / Jowell Olson vs Sean Buckley / Kyle Whalen2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men (Wednesdays) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Tony Hennies
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.83
Andrew de Jong
published 4
3.80
Brian McIntire
published 4
3.76
Bruno Do Amaral
published 4
3.64
Chris Neblett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.46
Robert Radel
published
3.42
Jowell Olson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Carl Cline
published 3.5
3.21
Ben Landis
published 3.5
3.20
Adam McKenry
published 3.5
3.04
Mark Cabler
published
Greg Burley
published
James Estigoy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Cabler + Carl Cline1441% gamesnot enough data
Jowell Olson + Brian McIntire123 matchesnot enough data
Adam McKenry + Brian McIntire123 matchesnot enough data
Adam McKenry + Andrew de Jong213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tony Hennies
97W–48L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Andrew de Jong
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Brian McIntire
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.80
4
Bruno Do Amaral
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Chris Neblett
20W–49L career · 8 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Robert Radel
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.46
Jowell Olson
43W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Carl Cline
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Ben Landis
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Adam McKenry
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Mark Cabler
11W–18L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
Greg Burley
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
James Estigoy
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.