Teams

LLW - SFV Love Games - Angela Martinez-Lee

SFV-Adult 18 & Over · SFV - Women 3.5 Weekend

14 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-06vs SFV Team OsaWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndrea Kinloch / Beverly Wilkerson vs Jackie Vo / Diana Hiller6-1, 6-1
2021-05-30vs SFV Team NFFSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMelissa Fonteboa vs Tasha Gailys1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnnik Bogharian / Beverly Wilkerson vs Christine Daniel / Lauren Koenig6-7, 1-6
2021-05-23vs SFV Paseo TribeWon 10
W#1 SinglesMelissa Fonteboa vs Rocio Anderson6-3, 6-3
2021-05-01vs SFV Play it ForwardWon 10
W#2 DoublesMelissa Fonteboa / Christine Steele vs Meri Vitiello / Patricia Francisco6-0, 7-6
2021-04-24Lost 01
L#1 SinglesBeverly Wilkerson vs Cristina Acosta-Padron0-6, 0-6
2021-04-17vs SFV Whats a WeekendLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnnik Bogharian / Melissa Fonteboa vs Kayla Smith / Bertha ODonnell2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV - Women 3.5 Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Annik Bogharian
published 4
3.63
Dana Ravner
published 4
3.62
Melissa Fonteboa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.60
Shannon Minor
published
3.60
Michelle Farhadi
published
3.58
Betty Shalom
published 3.5
3.56
Michelle Wild
published
3.53
Lisa Bourne
published
3.19
Christine Steele
published 3.5
3.17
Kimberley Walker
published
3.06
Angela Martinez-Lee
published 3.5
3.05
Andrea Kinloch
published 3.5
2.69
Beverly Wilkerson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Lauren Haber
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beverly Wilkerson + Melissa Fonteboa303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Annik Bogharian
4W–1L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Dana Ravner
19W–4L career · no lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
3.63
4
Melissa Fonteboa
178W–188L career · 4 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62
Shannon Minor
3W–7L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.60
Michelle Farhadi
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Betty Shalom
121W–55L career · no lines in 2021
<1%26%74%
3.58
Michelle Wild
10W–14L career · no lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.56
Lisa Bourne
9W–20L career · no lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Christine Steele
4W–15L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
Kimberley Walker
3W–7L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Angela Martinez-Lee
5W–8L career · no lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.06
3.5
Andrea Kinloch
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Beverly Wilkerson
71W–109L career · 3 lines in 2021
8%92%1%
2.69
Lauren Haber
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.