Teams

Mahoski/Bryant

2026 IA 65 & Over Adult League · 8.0 65 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / IOWA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-04-19vs IA/Carlyle-Miller/65&Over8.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Ellard / Randy Childers vs Eric Bligard / Fred Pedersen4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Stierman / William Hughes vs Ronald Bradfield / Joel Sissel3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristopher Bryant / Charles Mahoski vs William (Ev) Cochrane / Ronald Miller1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 65 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
William Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Randy Childers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
John Stierman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.42
Christopher Bryant
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Daniel Ellard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Charles Mahoski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Hughes + Christopher Bryant3548% games−3.5% vs expected
William Hughes + John Stierman5852% games−6.7% vs expected
Daniel Ellard + Randy Childers2346% gamesnot enough data
William Hughes + Randy Childers3265% gamesnot enough data
Charles Mahoski + Christopher Bryant213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Hughes
22W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Randy Childers
17W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.59
John Stierman
23W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Christopher Bryant
19W–25L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.42
3.5
Daniel Ellard
12W–19L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Charles Mahoski
18W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.