Teams

WRAC-Noyd

2022 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 WOMEN

9 players · average NTRP 3.58 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-11-06vs CBRC-CooleyWon 21
L#1 DoublesDarillyn Flones / Jennifer Carlson vs Evoria Beasley / Victoria Smoot3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesConnie Russ / Selena Hernandez vs Paula Davis-Vedder / Cheryl Cooley7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLeslie Blair / Cynthia Noyd vs Karin Kontogianis / Val Otto6-4, 6-1
2021-11-06vs SC-SteinerWon 30
W#1 DoublesDeena Sprague / Pamela Kromholtz vs Cindy Fenick / Voni Tombari6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDarillyn Flones / Jennifer Carlson vs Kelly Wood / Heidi Rudy6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCynthia Noyd / Leslie Blair vs Sandee Andrews / Marie Lambert6-4, 6-4
2021-11-05vs IND-Tri-State Warriors WIMWon 21
L#1 DoublesLeslie Blair / Cynthia Noyd vs Sherry Varner / Terri Ruthruff0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesConnie Russ / Selena Hernandez vs Lisa Marks / Janie Slater6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJennifer Carlson / Darillyn Flones vs Karen Henderson / Cyndie Lempesis2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Connie Russ
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.28
Darillyn Flones
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Cynthia Noyd
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Annette Alt
published 3.5
J Colleen Berry
published 3.5
2.73
Jennifer Carlson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Leslie Blair
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Pamela Kromholtz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Selena Hernandez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Darillyn Flones + Jennifer Carlson9551% games+6.1% vs expected
Cynthia Noyd + Jennifer Carlson1445% games+3.3% vs expected
Annette Alt + Cynthia Noyd314 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Blair + Cynthia Noyd224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Connie Russ
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Darillyn Flones
40W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Cynthia Noyd
17W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Annette Alt
5W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
J Colleen Berry
8W–24L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Jennifer Carlson
34W–37L career · 3 lines in 2022
98%2%<1%
2.73
Leslie Blair
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Pamela Kromholtz
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Selena Hernandez
8W–13L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.