Teams

Alachua/Banes

2025 Alachua Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.20 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-13vs DB - Challenge = PrivilegeWon 10
W#1 DoublesNikki Perrino / Elize VanZyl vs Alaina Gray / Anita Rajasekhar6-3, 6-3
2025-10-30vs DB - Challenge = PrivilegeWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Dace / Elize VanZyl vs Jenny Neelands / Alaina Gray6-2, 7-5
2025-10-15vs DB - Challenge = PrivilegeLost 12
L#1 DoublesElize VanZyl / Emily Dace vs Anne Stricklin / Julie Sager2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesWheeler Crawford / Nikki Perrino vs Christine Padron / Samantha Penhale5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Banes / Tracey Bryant vs Christy Ulbricht / Susannah Peddie6-4, 6-1
2025-10-12vs DB - Challenge = PrivilegeWon 20
W#1 DoublesKelly Banes / Jordan Davis vs Marie Vanasse / Elizabeth Dickerson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNikki Perrino / Elize VanZyl vs Jenny Neelands / Anita Rajasekhar7-6, 6-2
2025-09-25vs DB - Challenge = PrivilegeWon 21
L#1 DoublesKelly Banes / Wheeler Crawford vs Alaina Gray / Samantha Penhale6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEmily Dace / Elize VanZyl vs Nour Oweiss / Anita Rajasekhar6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRachel Rodriguez / Tracey Bryant vs Christine Padron / Susannah Peddie6-2, 6-2
2025-09-24vs DB - Challenge = PrivilegeLost 01
L#2 DoublesKelly Banes / Tracey Bryant vs Anne Stricklin / Julie Sager6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-09-10vs DB - Challenge = PrivilegeWon 20
W#2 DoublesKelly Banes / Tracey Bryant vs Alaina Gray / Julie Sager6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNikki Perrino / Elize VanZyl vs Marie Vanasse / Jenny Neelands6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Kelly Banes
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.33
Nikki Perrino
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.30
Emily Dace
published
3.98
Elize VanZyl
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.94
Wheeler Crawford
published
3.91
Alyssa Ray
published 4
3.84
Tracey Bryant
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.81
Jordan Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Banes + Tracey Bryant4361% gamesnot enough data
Elize VanZyl + Nikki Perrino4161% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Banes + Emily Dace314 matchesnot enough data
Elize VanZyl + Alyssa Ray303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kelly Banes
136W–60L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
4.36
4.5
Nikki Perrino
57W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
4.33
Emily Dace
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
4.30
4
Elize VanZyl
33W–14L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.98
Wheeler Crawford
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Alyssa Ray
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.91
4
Tracey Bryant
48W–45L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
Jordan Davis
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.