Teams

Fiddlers Creek - D.Keely

2024 Collier Mixed 55 & Over ESL Fall · 2024 Mixed 55 & over 7.0 Fall

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-12-20vs Fall Winners /Marco YMCA - GauchLost 02
L#2 DoublesTina Jaquess / Marco Arilli vs Dina Viteretti / Ben Yocom3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPeggy Keigley / David Keely vs Suzanne Messere / Andy Mintz4-6, 4-6
2023-12-02vs Naples YMCA - GarrettLost 01
L#1 DoublesPeggy Keigley / James Ray vs David Garrett / Sara Garrett3-6, 4-6
2023-11-11vs Fall Winners /Marco YMCA - GauchWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarco Arilli / Tina Jaquess vs Jacqueline Heise / Robert Jewett7-6, 7-6
2023-10-28vs Naples YMCA - GarrettWon 10
W#1 DoublesTina Jaquess / James Ray vs Sara Garrett / David Garrett6-3, 6-3
2023-10-21vs VineyardsWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarco Arilli / Tina Jaquess vs William Danford / Lorraine Indiveri7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPeggy Keigley / James Ray vs Thomas Moran / Mary Caruso5-7, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2024 Mixed 55 & over 7.0 Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
James Digeronimo
published 4
3.51
Joseph Kardek
published
3.51
David Keely
published 3.5
3.36
Mary Defalco
published
James Ray
published 3.5
3.25
Tina Jaquess
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.18
Linda Keely
published
3.11
Victoria Pollock
published
3.02
Odette Kardek
published
Marco Arilli
published
Peggy Keigley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Keely + David Keely2348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
James Digeronimo
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.61
Joseph Kardek
11W–39L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
David Keely
32W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.51
Mary Defalco
28W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
James Ray
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tina Jaquess
105W–80L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
Linda Keely
11W–22L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
Victoria Pollock
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
Odette Kardek
13W–27L career · no lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.02
Marco Arilli
19W–15L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Peggy Keigley
92W–58L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.