Teams

Vineyards /

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-10vs Pelican Marsh / K. VictoryLost 01
L#2 DoublesPatricia MacDonald / Melanie Howe vs K VICTORY / Amy Keller3-6, 0-6
2025-03-06vs Imperial (Gomez) Tennis / HaasLost 12
W#1 DoublesLynn Corritori / Cathy Guida vs Barbara Hurt-Simmons / Elaine Morrison6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRuth Davies / Carmela Melito vs Cheryl Comes / Linda Koenig5-7, 0-4
L#3 DoublesSharyn Chabot / Pat Stewart vs Martha Oberstein / Julie Waldon3-6, 2-6
2025-01-30vs Imperial (Gomez) Tennis / HaasLost 01
L#1 DoublesLynn Corritori / Patricia MacDonald vs Barbara Hurt-Simmons / Elaine Morrison1-6, 1-6
2025-01-16vs Pelican Bay North / BrooksLost 01
L#1 DoublesDebra Barnett / Patricia MacDonald vs Anastasia Brooks / Beth Fuchs3-6, 3-6
2025-01-09vs COLLIER/Howard/55&Over7.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesPatricia MacDonald / Pamela Conger vs Denna Saidnawey / Sue Malek2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Debra Barnett
published 3.5
3.25
Cathy Guida
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.91
Rhonda Kelly
published
2.88
Lynn Corritori
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Sharyn Chabot
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Melanie Howe
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
Pat Stewart
published
Patricia MacDonald
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Ruth Davies
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia MacDonald + Melanie Howe5151% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Debra Barnett
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Cathy Guida
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Rhonda Kelly
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
2.91
Lynn Corritori
25W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.88
Sharyn Chabot
13W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Melanie Howe
23W–105L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Pat Stewart
47W–47L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia MacDonald
56W–78L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ruth Davies
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.