Teams

SD 4.0 Mtn View (3:2)/ Reyes

2023 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD · SD - Men - 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-04vs SoCal/Barraquio/18&Over4.0MWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarc Channick / Ryan Adams vs Khoa Nguyen / Vincent Travaglione6-4, 6-0
2023-06-23vs SD 4.0 CTC/ CHS (3:2)/ PennWon 10
W#3 DoublesVijay Desiraju / Marc Channick vs Dee Domingo / Gautam Sethi6-1, 6-3
2023-05-28Won 10
W#2 SinglesMarc Channick vs Edward Wang6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMarc Channick / Ryan Adams vs Daniel Henry Schwartzman / Joshua Kracoff1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-07Won 20
W#1 DoublesScott Atwood / Vijay Desiraju vs Zackary Tuazon / Samuel Michan6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMarc Channick / Jon Schimmer vs Hamid Moradi / Michael Neusch6-2, 6-0
2023-04-30vs SD 4.0 Lake Murray (3:2)/ HillWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarc Channick / Lorenzo Herrera vs Steve Gerard / Edward Grader6-3, 6-3
2023-04-23vs SD 4.0 Balboa TC (2:3)/ NguyenWon 21
W#2 DoublesMarc Channick / Scott Atwood vs Steve Cole / George Benakos6-0, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJon Schimmer vs Gregory Gerardo6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesVijay Desiraju / Jeffrey Steen vs Christopher Barrera / Aayush Khurana3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-04-16vs SD 4.0 PBTC (2@11AM:3) / MaurizLost 02
L#1 SinglesJon Schimmer vs Scott Hung6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMarc Channick / Ryan Adams vs Will Mauriz / Teppei Karasawa7-6, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Marc Channick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.89
Jeffrey Steen
published
3.86
Scott Atwood
published
3.76
Ryan Adams
published
3.73
Vijay Desiraju
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Jon Schimmer
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.26
Nick Runde
published
Lorenzo Herrera
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marc Channick + Ryan Adams3259% games−2.9% vs expected
Jon Schimmer + Marc Channick4358% gamesnot enough data
Scott Atwood + Ryan Adams213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Marc Channick
202W–81L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
4.01
Jeffrey Steen
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.89
Scott Atwood
18W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.86
Ryan Adams
12W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Vijay Desiraju
50W–37L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Jon Schimmer
37W–35L career · 3 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.64
Nick Runde
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%4%
3.26
Lorenzo Herrera
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.