Teams

LCTA18/Stribling/Maybank

Other 18 & Over Singles League · Women 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-13vs LCTA18/Rehder/HamlinSplit 11
L#1 SinglesEmma Hillary vs Marian Wolff0-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesAmanda Benepe vs Jennifer Mather6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCailin Dorsey vs Katey Deas5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAmanda Benepe vs Linda-Triin Ait3-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesElizabeth Stribling vs Sarah Cala6-2, 0-6, 1-0
2026-05-16vs LCTA18/Nipp/MPRWon 21
L#1 SinglesJade Petersma vs Kelsey Doddridge2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesTaylor Cromley vs Christine Pochily6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesAshley Pace vs Alice Petzold6-1, 6-4
2026-05-09vs LCTA18/Williams/DICWon 21
W#1 SinglesAddie Pate vs Kelly Norton7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Stribling vs Debbie OBrien7-5, 6-4
L#3 SinglesLindsay Wigginton vs Lora Dennis2-6, 2-6
2026-05-03vs LCTA18/Anderson/CTCWon 21
W#1 SinglesCailin Dorsey vs Irina Pevzner6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesCindi Katz vs Mellody Burford6-0, 6-2
L#3 SinglesTaylor Cromley vs Jesusa Tuppil6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-04-25vs LCTA18/Miller/Dunes WestLost 03
L#1 SinglesAshley Pace vs Neda Smith3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesLindsay Wigginton vs Christy Miller2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesEmma Hillary vs Lindsay Moore1-6, 0-6
2025-09-17vs LCTA18/Williams/DICWon 10
W#1 DoublesCailin Dorsey / Cindi Katz vs Lora Dennis / Victoria Ubina-Katzburg2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LCTA18/Williams/DIC5114411121
2LCTA18/Stribling/Maybank5110819153
3LCTA18/Cala-Hoffman/Brickyard Hoffman4214410106
4LCTA18/Miller/Dunes West4213511107
5LCTA18/Nipp/MPR2461225167

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Addie Pate
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
3.00
Cailin Dorsey
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.98
Elizabeth Stribling
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.81
Amanda Benepe
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.74
Jade Petersma
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.73
Ashley Pace
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.71
Cindi Katz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.58
Lindsay Wigginton
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.49
Emma Hillary
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Taylor Cromley
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Wigginton + Ashley Pace4351% games+4.9% vs expected
Cindi Katz + Ashley Pace4165% gamesnot enough data
Lindsay Wigginton + Jade Petersma303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Addie Pate
17W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.09
3
Cailin Dorsey
12W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
Elizabeth Stribling
75W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Amanda Benepe
2W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Jade Petersma
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Ashley Pace
53W–63L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Cindi Katz
40W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Lindsay Wigginton
53W–60L career · 2 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
Emma Hillary
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.49
Taylor Cromley
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.