Teams

AHanda-CHTC

2025 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo 7.5 Men Evening

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-06vs NPuri-DURSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNathan Bearman / Richard Henderson vs Rajshekar Chandraprakash / Sanjay Ambardar7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDonovan Khamphasong / Sudhanshu Handa vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-05vs DBaddour-CHCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesNathan Bearman / Randy Cubrilovic vs Niels Lameijer / Richard Woods6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2025-09-22vs CRoessler-HRLost 01
L#2 DoublesSudhanshu Handa / Donovan Khamphasong vs David Grose / Daniel Hill2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-09-08vs DHenley-HVCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesSudhanshu Handa / Donovan Khamphasong vs Bayard Collins / RICHARD GRIFFIN7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNathan Bearman / Randy Cubrilovic vs Mark Anderson / John Burkert6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2025-08-28vs NPuri-DURWon 20
W#1 DoublesSudhanshu Handa / Donovan Khamphasong vs Srinath Ekkad / Rajshekar Chandraprakash3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNathan Bearman / Randy Cubrilovic vs Sanjay Ambardar / Vishal Gupta6-4, 6-2
2025-08-25vs EFuguet-DFCLost 01
L#2 DoublesNathan Bearman / Donovan Khamphasong vs Nick Buchler / Jeff Welty4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 7.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Zachary Osofsky
published
3.93
Sudhanshu Handa
published
3.87
Chris Combs
published 4
3.86
Nathan Bearman
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.66
Ganesh Kamath
published
3.61
Matthew Curry
published
3.40
Randy Cubrilovic
published
Darren DeWalt
published 3.5
3.23
Donovan Khamphasong
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Scott Benson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nathan Bearman + Chris Combs404 matchesnot enough data
Nathan Bearman + Donovan Khamphasong033 matchesnot enough data
Chris Combs + Ganesh Kamath123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zachary Osofsky
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
4.12
Sudhanshu Handa
7W–14L career · no lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.93
4
Chris Combs
23W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.87
4
Nathan Bearman
118W–60L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
Ganesh Kamath
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Matthew Curry
29W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.61
Randy Cubrilovic
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
3.5
Darren DeWalt
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Donovan Khamphasong
54W–68L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Scott Benson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.