Teams

Well Strung

2021 NOVA Adult 18 & Over · NOVA Adult 18 & Over Men 3.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2021-06-19vs Luck of the IrishSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJohn Borsi / Travis Frenzel vs Howard Fowler / Thomas Cyrnak0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRob Wright / Majed Hamawy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-06-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesKai Yu / Mikhail Velasco vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-06-12vs Team RJT M3.5Split 11
L#2 DoublesJohn Borsi / Majed Hamawy vs Kenneth Young / Jarrett Ray6-7, 3-4
W#3 DoublesTravis Frenzel / Mikhail Velasco vs Daniel Hurley / Daniel Aronowitz6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-28Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Kai Yu vs Bryan Tucker / Brendan O'Neil5-7, 5-6
2021-05-26vs Tennis TitansLost 01
L#1 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Stephen Jones vs Doan Nguyen / Ryan Tucker7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2021-05-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMikhail Velasco / John Borsi vs Rahul Sharma / Rahul Sharma2-6, 1-6
2021-05-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesWesley Stien / Majed Hamawy vs Mark Allen / John Bruner6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-05-15Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTravis Frenzel / Jerry Kavinski vs Kenneth Young / Ashwin Joshi2-6, 1-6
2021-04-28vs Last RideLost 02
L#2 DoublesMiguel Mendoza / Mikhail Velasco vs Ricardo Green / Francisco Santos0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTravis Frenzel / Bryan Ferrell vs Scott Davis / Paul Lluy2-6, 1-6
2021-04-23vs Skyline CourtmastersLost 01
L#2 DoublesTravis Frenzel / Miguel Mendoza vs Tezcan Inanlar / Laurent Zazzera2-6, 4-6
2021-04-18vs Tennis TitansWon 10
W#3 DoublesArtan Guzja / Majed Hamawy vs John Cummins / Siva Chennuru6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Majed Hamawy
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Kai Yu
published
2.71
Miguel Mendoza
published
2.70
Travis Frenzel
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.69
Mikhail Velasco
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.63
Rob Wright
published
Stephen Gotts
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Majed Hamawy
379W–517L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%57%43%
2.98
Kai Yu
6W–13L career · no lines in 2021
76%24%<1%
2.91
Miguel Mendoza
12W–6L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
2.71
Travis Frenzel
56W–43L career · 5 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
2.70
3
Mikhail Velasco
42W–52L career · 4 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
2.69
Rob Wright
1W–13L career · no lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
2.63
Stephen Gotts
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.