Teams

Honey Badgers

2024 Montgomery Adult 40 & Over · Montgomery Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.95 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-29vs RubinoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJenelle Langen / Karyn ODonnell vs Jessica Somers / Gillian Moorhead6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAllison Fulton / Jennifer Davis vs Shan Wang / Sarah Schrieber1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-03-23vs ReLEE SPICEySplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaryn ODonnell / Jennifer Davis vs Kimberly Wells / Jaime Lewis6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesTina Halley vs Jenni Bae1-6, 4-6
2024-03-05vs FairbanksWon 10
W#1 SinglesTina Halley vs Katya Vert-Wong6-2, 6-0
2024-02-29vs ReLEE SPICEyWon 10
W#1 SinglesJenelle Langen vs Liz Christensen6-3, 4-4
2024-02-16vs RubinoWon 20
W#1 DoublesJenelle Langen / Janette Pepper vs Carolyn Greis / Sarah Schrieber7-6, 5-5
W#3 DoublesTina Halley / Erin Kim vs Martha Nolan / Kim Hazel6-0, 6-1
2024-02-13vs MoCo MagicSplit 11
L#2 DoublesVictoria Copeland / Debbie Cafferty vs Laleh Mosavati / Charlotte Larson2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesErin Kim / Tina Halley vs Lisa Schneiderman / Elizabeth Levy4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-02-05vs BallbustersSplit 11
W#1 SinglesTina Halley vs Gail Douglass4-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSadia Shafi / Allyson McMahon vs Michelle Bryan / Sharon Huang3-6, 1-6
2024-01-30vs FairbanksLost 12
W#1 DoublesJenelle Langen / Janette Pepper vs Kimberlee Overdeck / Tana Jankowiak6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesDeborah Greenside vs Alexis McCary1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDebbie Cafferty / Sadia Shafi vs Kim Chamberlain / Loan Nguyen1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Tina Halley
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.82
Joy Oliver
published
3.81
Janette Pepper
published
3.76
Victoria Copeland
published
Allison Fulton
published 4
3.67
Jenelle Langen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.67
Karyn ODonnell
published
3.67
Anita Wilson
published 4
3.66
Betsy Johnston
published 4
3.62
Jennifer Davis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.58
Allyson McMahon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Deborah Greenside
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Debbie Cafferty
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.42
Brenda Clark
published 4
3.38
Ami Chastain
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allyson McMahon + Ami Chastain2540% games−11.8% vs expected
Jenelle Langen + Ami Chastain4258% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Davis + Allyson McMahon213 matchesnot enough data
Betsy Johnston + Brenda Clark123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tina Halley
128W–66L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.88
Joy Oliver
15W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.82
Janette Pepper
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.81
Victoria Copeland
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Allison Fulton
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Jenelle Langen
243W–115L career · 4 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
Karyn ODonnell
66W–58L career · no lines in 2024
<1%11%89%
3.67
4
Anita Wilson
32W–41L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Betsy Johnston
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.66
4
Jennifer Davis
119W–87L career · 2 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Allyson McMahon
54W–46L career · 1 line in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Deborah Greenside
139W–167L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.55
4
Debbie Cafferty
17W–41L career · 2 lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
3.43
4
Brenda Clark
14W–16L career · no lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
3.42
4
Ami Chastain
137W–98L career · no lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
3.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.