Teams

GEPTA-4.5-Adult/18+M(Friedl)(EPTC#1)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

15 players · average NTRP 4.40 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.19 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Abraham Gandarilla
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 4.5
4.34
Andres Madrid
usually #1 Singles 30%, also #2 Singles 30% · published 4.5
Armando Navarro
published 4.5
3.88
Andy Boettjer
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 35% · published 4.5
David Quintanar
published 4
Emmanuel Quintana
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Jacob Maese
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Jesus Jeffery
published
John Pfirman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Jorge Chavez
usually #1 Singles 37%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Jose Maese
usually #3 Doubles 45%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published
Julio Cesar CastaNEDA
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
Marco Gonzalez Friedl
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
Michael Kotowski
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Timothy Cantrell
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacob Maese + Jose Maese9453% games+9.3% vs expected
Timothy Cantrell + Andy Boettjer5751% games−10.9% vs expected
Andres Madrid + Julio Cesar CastaNEDA2644% gamesnot enough data
Timothy Cantrell + Jose Maese2445% gamesnot enough data
Andy Boettjer + Jose Maese2443% gamesnot enough data
John Pfirman + Abraham Gandarilla4154% gamesnot enough data
Abraham Gandarilla + Emmanuel Quintana123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Abraham Gandarilla
71W–41L career · 16 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
4.36
4.5
Andres Madrid
25W–25L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
4.34
4.5
Armando Navarro
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Andy Boettjer
51W–64L career · 26 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.88
4
David Quintanar
31W–56L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Emmanuel Quintana
8W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jacob Maese
48W–40L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jesus Jeffery
30W–26L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Pfirman
39W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jorge Chavez
65W–38L career · 27 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jose Maese
46W–64L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data
Julio Cesar CastaNEDA
20W–28L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marco Gonzalez Friedl
83W–113L career · 26 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Kotowski
125W–48L career · 35 lines in 2025
not enough data
Timothy Cantrell
43W–58L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.