Teams

SC-Racqueteers

2022 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-07-10vs CBRC-MehlenbacherLost 03
L#1 DoublesTheresa Koehler / Craig Hansen vs Bryan Coles / Kathy Mehlenbacher2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Bayley / Mark Gray vs Evan Mehlenbacher / Paula Davis-Vedder5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJanice Leitner / Wayne Leitner vs Kent Ozkardesh / Maria Davis0-6, 3-6
2022-07-10vs WRAC-NoydLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Cramer / James Cramer vs KIMBERLY HABICH / Brad Bartol1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJanice Leitner / Wayne Leitner vs Kelley Quinn / Michael Bendtsen0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKimberly Bayley / Nicholas Geranios vs Darillyn Flones / Mark Taylor3-6, 1-6
2022-07-09vs CBRC-MehlenbacherLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Cramer / James Cramer vs Bryan Coles / Kathy Mehlenbacher1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKimberly Bayley / Nicholas Geranios vs Kent Ozkardesh / Gail Sears0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTheresa Koehler / Craig Hansen vs Todd Samuel / Huijuan Zhang6-7, 5-7
2022-07-09vs WRAC-NoydLost 03
L#1 DoublesTheresa Koehler / Craig Hansen vs KIMBERLY HABICH / Brad Bartol3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Bayley / Mark Gray vs Kelley Quinn / Michael Bendtsen6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJanice Leitner / Wayne Leitner vs Darillyn Flones / Mark Taylor4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WRAC-Noyd40111469
2SC-Racqueteers0401224146

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Kimberly Bayley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
James Cramer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Janice Leitner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Craig Hansen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.71
Theresa Koehler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Karen Cramer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lori Nicol
published
Nicholas Geranios
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Wayne Leitner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Theresa Koehler + Craig Hansen1445% gamesnot enough data
Janice Leitner + Wayne Leitner0529% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Bayley
23W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
James Cramer
22W–40L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Janice Leitner
35W–30L career · 3 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Craig Hansen
28W–49L career · 3 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
3
Theresa Koehler
22W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.71
Karen Cramer
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lori Nicol
28W–29L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nicholas Geranios
0W–11L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Wayne Leitner
4W–13L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.