Teams

Booth/Horne/MH/LR&F

2026 Mixed 40 & Over 3.5, 4.5 · 3.5 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-27vs Bemis/Luck/MH/LR&FWon 21
W#1 DoublesGrant Talbot / Cara Barber vs Cassandra Jestice / Joseph Jestice6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesScott Booth / Nicole Horne vs Sarah Blagg / John Gibbs1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAmy McKay / Walt McKay vs David Luck / Jillian Bemis6-4, 7-5
2026-07-20vs Bemis/Luck/MH/LR&FWon 21
L#1 DoublesCara Barber / Grant Talbot vs Sarah Blagg / John Gibbs4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNicole Horne / Jody Horne vs Cassandra Jestice / Joseph Jestice7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmy McKay / Thomas Czanstkowski vs Cara Coleman / Bradley Coleman6-3, 7-5
2026-07-20vs Bemis/Luck/MH/LR&FWon 30
W#1 DoublesGrant Talbot / Cara Barber vs David Luck / Jillian Bemis6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNicole Horne / Jody Horne vs Joseph Jestice / Cassandra Jestice7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAllison Booth / Thomas Czanstkowski vs Cara Coleman / Bradley Coleman6-2, 6-3
2026-07-13vs Bemis/Luck/MH/LR&FLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy McKay / Walt McKay vs Cassandra Jestice / Joseph Jestice1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesNicole Horne / Jody Horne vs David Luck / Jillian Bemis6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAllison Booth / Scott Booth vs Sarah Blagg / John Gibbs3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Booth/Horne/MH/LR&F318410105
2Bemis/Luck/MH/LR&F134816120

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Cara Barber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Amy McKay
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Grant Talbot
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Allison Booth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.90
Jody Horne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Thomas Czanstkowski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Walt McKay
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Nicole Horne
published
Scott Booth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Booth + Scott Booth123 matchesnot enough data
Cara Barber + Grant Talbot213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cara Barber
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Amy McKay
7W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
3.41
3.5
Grant Talbot
2W–1L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Allison Booth
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
Jody Horne
11W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.90
Thomas Czanstkowski
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
2.81
Walt McKay
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.57
Nicole Horne
5W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Scott Booth
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.