Teams

Selma - Henry

2024 Selma Southern Combo Doubles 18's · Women's 7.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.67 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-10-05vs Team Selma - WilliamsLost 12
L#1 DoublesBradford Brackin / Rebecca Stewart vs Michelle Pearce / Callen Free3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKim Simpkins / Leigh Chappelle vs Rebecca Youngblood / Sid Utsey2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAmanda Henry / Rachel Todd vs Lilly Youngblood / Katie Barrette6-3, 6-2
2024-10-02vs Team Selma - WilliamsLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmanda Henry / Kim Simpkins vs Jenni Payne / Keisha Wilson1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLeigh Chappelle / Kim Pierson vs Mary Ashlyn Pearce / Sid Utsey4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Stewart / Rachel Todd vs Ashley Williams / Katie Barrette2-6, 0-6
2024-09-29vs Team Selma - WilliamsLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Henry / Rachel Todd vs Callen Free / Michelle Pearce1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBradford Brackin / Rebecca Stewart vs Sid Utsey / Ashley Williams6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesLeigh Chappelle / Landon Posey vs Keisha Wilson / Rebecca Youngblood4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
DANITA ALLEN
published 4
3.33
Amanda Henry
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Leigh Chappelle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Rachel Todd
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.18
Kim Simpkins
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.18
Bradford Brackin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Kim Pierson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Landon Posey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leigh Chappelle + Rachel Todd4356% games+3.8% vs expected
Kim Simpkins + Rachel Todd123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
DANITA ALLEN
24W–15L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Amanda Henry
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Leigh Chappelle
28W–18L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
Rachel Todd
26W–24L career · 6 lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.24
Kim Simpkins
5W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Bradford Brackin
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Kim Pierson
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Landon Posey
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.