Teams

Ch.Higgins40C

2023 Cap Combo 40 & Over · 8.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-05vs Be.Copeland40CLost 02
L#1 DoublesRachel Davis / Chunhui Higgins vs Paula Fernandez-Pita / Emily Culbreth3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNannette Goodwin / Sandy Wood vs Danielle Wilder / Mary Money1-6, 2-6
2023-10-02vs St.Luther40C8.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesLaura McNiven / Nannette Goodwin vs Sherrie Lefere / Korri Styers6-0, 6-1
2023-09-25vs Be.Copeland40CLost 02
L#1 DoublesRachel Davis / Chunhui Higgins vs Tanya Parise / Mary Money7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNannette Goodwin / Laura McNiven vs Danielle Wilder / Terry Dale3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2023-09-11vs St.Luther40C8.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesNannette Goodwin / Mary Prabel vs Carol Muth / Fran Ange6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChunhui Higgins / Sandy Wood vs Christi Bowser / Stephanie Luther6-3, 6-3
2023-08-28vs Be.Copeland40CLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnn Bowler / Aileen Carroll vs Jane Britt / Tanya Parise1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNannette Goodwin / Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo vs Paula Fernandez-Pita / Diane Werner1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesIra Duarte / Laura McNiven vs Erin Rankin / Laura Weygandt5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2023-08-14vs St.Luther40C8.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesChunhui Higgins / Aileen Carroll vs Juli Korsnack / Susan King6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesXimena Ordonez-Acevedo / Tatiana Nevmyrych vs Korri Styers / Jennifer London6-1, 6-3
2023-08-07vs Be.Copeland40CWon 20
W#1 DoublesRachel Davis / Chunhui Higgins vs Jane Britt / Tanya Parise6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNannette Goodwin / Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo vs Emily Culbreth / Elizabeth Copeland6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-07-18vs St.Luther40C8.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesNannette Goodwin / Mary Prabel vs Fran Ange / Carol Muth6-2, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Chunhui Higgins
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.88
Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Laura McNiven
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.83
Nannette Goodwin
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.82
Aileen Carroll
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.76
Christina Loaiza
published 4
Ann Bowler
published 4
3.59
Sandy Wood
published
3.48
Tatiana Nevmyrych
published
3.40
Meike Schacht
published
Kristen Howering
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chunhui Higgins + Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo9359% games+6.3% vs expected
Laura McNiven + Nannette Goodwin6259% games−0.0% vs expected
Laura McNiven + Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo6353% gamesnot enough data
Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo + Nannette Goodwin7261% gamesnot enough data
Chunhui Higgins + Nannette Goodwin5257% gamesnot enough data
Chunhui Higgins + Laura McNiven4260% gamesnot enough data
Aileen Carroll + Chunhui Higgins4163% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chunhui Higgins
232W–92L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
3.99
4
Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo
169W–79L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Laura McNiven
352W–122L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Nannette Goodwin
313W–205L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Aileen Carroll
161W–109L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Christina Loaiza
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Ann Bowler
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sandy Wood
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.59
Tatiana Nevmyrych
2W–12L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.48
Meike Schacht
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.40
Kristen Howering
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.