Teams

SFV - Kiss My Ace

2023 Tri-Level 18+ SFV Summer · SFV Women's 3.0-4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.81 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-12vs SFV - Sugar & SpiceLost 01
L#3 DoublesKeiko Kato Verrier / Margie Englis vs Diana Guevara / TANIA JANICEK6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAbbey Everson / Margie Englis vs Sharon Monempour / Sheila Vasan3-6, 3-6
2023-07-22vs SFV - Calabasas Court JestersWon 10
W#3 DoublesMargie Englis / Jennifer Bevan vs Holly Culhane / Wendy Nickerson7-6, 7-5
2023-07-15vs SFV - Nice TriWon 10
W#3 DoublesMargie Englis / Keiko Kato Verrier vs Julie Arshonsky / Jenny Killgore4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-07-01vs SFV - 4 LoveWon 10
W#3 DoublesKeiko Kato Verrier / Margie Englis vs Pamela Bentley / Robina Markarian6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV Women's 3.0-4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Abbey Everson
published 4
3.87
Sara Heum
published 4
3.77
Teri Gustafson
published 4
3.72
Raizzi Rodriguez
published 4
3.69
Kirsten Andrews
published
3.69
Summer Williamson
published
3.58
Rumduol Vuong
published 4
3.48
Jennifer Bevan
published
3.37
Margie Englis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Alicia Duran
published 3.5
3.23
Amanda Saxe
published 3.5
3.10
Keiko Kato Verrier
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rumduol Vuong + Sara Heum3253% games+2.7% vs expected
Summer Williamson + Teri Gustafson6354% games−2.6% vs expected
Teri Gustafson + Sara Heum6356% gamesnot enough data
Teri Gustafson + Raizzi Rodriguez4454% gamesnot enough data
Sara Heum + Raizzi Rodriguez5259% gamesnot enough data
Teri Gustafson + Margie Englis6073% gamesnot enough data
Rumduol Vuong + Teri Gustafson2347% gamesnot enough data
Summer Williamson + Sara Heum134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Abbey Everson
157W–106L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Sara Heum
122W–69L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Teri Gustafson
84W–67L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Raizzi Rodriguez
94W–70L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Kirsten Andrews
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
Summer Williamson
48W–26L career · no lines in 2023
0%<1%>99%
3.69
4
Rumduol Vuong
57W–56L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
Jennifer Bevan
8W–18L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Margie Englis
169W–111L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Alicia Duran
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Amanda Saxe
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.23
Keiko Kato Verrier
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.