Teams

Je.Glennon18C2.5

2026 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-09-04vs Mo.Chaffee18CLost 03
L#1 DoublesVictoria Sumbs / Jessica Glennon vs Vina Jordano / Erin Reis3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKatherine Eatman / Jessica Heavner vs Jessica Tyndall / ROBIN STEWART2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMary Briley / Katie Crumpton vs Nicole Nemmers / Shannon Bulkowski1-6, 0-6
2026-08-28vs Me.Frost18CLost 03
L#1 DoublesKimberly Castro / Victoria Sumbs vs Beth Stagner / Robin Wascher0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Boyette / Mary Briley vs Melanie Frost / Kenzie Demetros1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Heavner / Jordan Barratt vs Ashley Woolley / Geri Russell7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-08-21vs Em.Boyer18CLost 12
L#1 DoublesNan Winborne / Victoria Sumbs vs Natalie Mayur / Amanda Zukowski4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Glennon / Meghan Comiskey vs Emily Boyer / Haley Battle6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKimberly Castro / Dalton Hunt vs Sara Averitt / Richelle Fox1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-14vs Ja.Bossert18CWon 30
W#1 DoublesJessica Glennon / Meghan Comiskey vs Darsan Russo / Kimberly Roberts7-6, 4-4
W#2 DoublesKimberly Castro / Dalton Hunt vs Jane Bossert / Jennifer Lewis6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKatherine Eatman / Jessica Heavner vs Christine Brandt / Linda Martini6-4, 6-3
2026-08-10vs Me.Dougher18C2.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJessica Glennon / Kimberly Castro vs Alexa Bowser / Maggie Hicks0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Heavner / Meghan Comiskey vs Melissa Dougher / Kristi Williams2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings23 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Mo.Chaffee18C3081447
2Lo.Stevens18C3072445
3Ka.Manooch18C3072669
4Me.Frost18C2163766
5Me.Dougher18C2.52154870
6Ch.Wellman18C22751080
7La.Bradley18C1021224
8Mo.Weimer18C1021328
9Je.Glennon18C2.51142446
10Bl.Cobb18C1133642
11Te.Marcott18C1133649
12Ni.Thomas18C1124856
13Me.Lee18C12451073
14Ma.Evans18C000000
15Br.Robinson18C000000
16Su.Potter18C000000
17La.Hampton18C000000
18Ka.Rollinson18C0112425
19Jo.Johnson18C0112535
20He.Russell18C0224963
21Em.Boyer18C02061273
22Ja.Bossert18C030918111
23Je.Frankie18C030918108

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.13 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.42
Kimberly Castro
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.37
Meghan Comiskey
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.28
Jordan Barratt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.15
Jessica Glennon
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.14
Dalton Hunt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.12
Nan Winborne
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.12
Katherine Eatman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.06
Victoria Sumbs
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.03
Jessica Heavner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.02
Elizabeth Boyette
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.00
Mary Briley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
1.96
Ashley Heavner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.96
Katie Crumpton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Victoria Sumbs + Jessica Glennon134 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Eatman + Jessica Heavner134 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Castro + Victoria Sumbs033 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Glennon + Ashley Heavner123 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Heavner + Mary Briley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Castro
3W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.42
Meghan Comiskey
4W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.37
Jordan Barratt
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.28
Jessica Glennon
3W–14L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.15
2.5
Dalton Hunt
3W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Nan Winborne
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Katherine Eatman
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Victoria Sumbs
1W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Jessica Heavner
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03
2.5
Elizabeth Boyette
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Mary Briley
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00
2.5
Ashley Heavner
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Katie Crumpton
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.