Teams

Twin Hickory Yu

2025 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Yu / Deirdre Vaughan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-09vs Burkwood AllenLost 01
L#1 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Melissa Allen4-6, 4-6
2025-06-04vs SCC AndrewsLost 01
L#1 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Savannah Exley6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-06-03vs Burkwood Cook WKDAYWon 10
W#1 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Tara Sobel6-2, 6-4
2025-05-29vs ACAC Jones VerbalettesLost 01
L#1 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Mary Knick2-6, 3-5
2025-05-27vs KRA PageWon 10
W#1 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Melanie Spears7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Kristy Babcock
published
3.27
Sara Kamencik
published
3.27
Deirdre Vaughan
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.23
Corinne Skevington
published 3.5
3.19
Michelle Yu
published
3.13
Jennifer Schwarz
published
3.07
Donna Hall
published
3.06
Cathy Parker
published 3
2.71
TONYA URQUHART
published
2.69
Penny Kivett
published
2.61
Suzanne Pericle
published
Holly Hamilton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Corinne Skevington + Jennifer Schwarz134 matchesnot enough data
Deirdre Vaughan + Jennifer Schwarz033 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Yu + Kristy Babcock303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristy Babcock
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.74
Sara Kamencik
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Deirdre Vaughan
162W–177L career · 9 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Corinne Skevington
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Michelle Yu
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Jennifer Schwarz
8W–15L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Donna Hall
14W–20L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
3
Cathy Parker
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
TONYA URQUHART
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Penny Kivett
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Suzanne Pericle
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Holly Hamilton
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.