Teams

2-KDunn-Eno

2022 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women-Evening

8 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-04-24vs 8-TPrinstein-HRSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKim Goll vs Dana Okeefe4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesKristin Isaacs vs Susan Kokot6-2, 6-4
2022-04-21Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAllison Taylor / Kim Goll vs Angela Davis / Adair Humphrey0-6, 1-6
2022-04-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKellie Johnson / Kristin Isaacs vs Erika Curry / Erin Finnegan1-6, 2-6
2022-04-14vs 7-mlong-Eno-18+3.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMaryJo McNeill / Kim Goll vs Beth Clark / Tammy Chin4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKristin Isaacs / Katie Helms vs Lisa Montague / Mary T Long0-6, 2-6
2022-03-28vs 3-KEspinola-UNCWon 10
W#2 SinglesKim Goll vs Vera Halpern4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-03-15vs 5-LDubois-EnoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKellie Johnson / Kristin Isaacs vs Kelly Conklin / Elizabeth Enderline6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesHala Souid / Kim Goll vs Caroline Perkinson / Samantha Smith6-3, 6-1
2022-03-03vs 1-DBaker-EnoLost 01
L#2 DoublesKatie Helms / Kristin Isaacs vs Debbie Baker / Laurie Straube1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women-Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Kim Goll
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.79
Kristin Isaacs
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.78
MaryJo McNeill
published
2.76
2.66
Katie Helms
published
2.57
Kellie Johnson
published
2.52
Krissy Dunn
published
2.08
Hala Souid
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Goll + Kristin Isaacs4266% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kim Goll
132W–134L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Kristin Isaacs
111W–164L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
MaryJo McNeill
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78
Jesse Shoemaker-Ramsey
11W–12L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76
Katie Helms
11W–12L career · no lines in 2022
0%11%89%
2.66
Kellie Johnson
18W–24L career · no lines in 2022
0%30%70%
2.57
Krissy Dunn
10W–16L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
2.52
2.5
Hala Souid
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.