Teams

LBK Club Curtin

2025 Sarasota Adult 65 & Over Winter · 7.0 W Monday

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-24vs Payne Park HallWon 20
W#1 DoublesPattiAnn Curtin / Louise Harris vs Beverly Austgen / Linda Kretlow7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Esposito / Karen Nejdawi vs Joyce Ottinger / Mary Welch6-4, 6-2
2025-03-17vs Mission Valley LoseySplit 11
W#2 DoublesBetsy Winder / PattiAnn Curtin vs CHIEKO OHRSTROM / Betty Biesiada6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLouise Harris / Joanne Christie vs Susan Terry / Beverly Chalmers4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2025-03-02vs LWR Varsity GirlsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesPattiAnn Curtin / Laura Esposito vs Nancy Bartlett / Patricia Cunningham6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Nejdawi / Susan Travers vs Loel Davenport / Maureen Meaney6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-02-10vs Sarasota/DeBoer/65&Over7.0WWon 10
W#3 DoublesKaren Nejdawi / Susan Travers vs Lana Anderson / Marylynn Miles6-4, 6-1
2025-01-13vs Meadows Pink YaYasLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Nejdawi / Denise Fusselman vs Linda Hosmer / Alice Levine5-7, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Denise Fusselman
published 3.5
3.28
Betsy Winder
published 3.5
3.17
Karen Nejdawi
usually #3 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Joanne Christie
published
Julie McGue
published
Kimberley Wilson
published
Laura Esposito
published
Louise Harris
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Mary Stein
published
Nancy Smith
published
PattiAnn Curtin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Travers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

PattiAnn Curtin + Louise Harris5152% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Fusselman
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Betsy Winder
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Karen Nejdawi
41W–64L career · 9 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Joanne Christie
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie McGue
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kimberley Wilson
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Esposito
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Louise Harris
11W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Stein
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Smith
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
PattiAnn Curtin
25W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Travers
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.