Teams

SD 3.5 Mountain View/ Wunderly

2022 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD · SD - Women - 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.93 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-07vs SD LLW 3.5 Mountain View/ PadillaLost 01
L#3 DoublesSakiko Tadokoro / Junko Toda vs Reyna Velazquez / Sylvia Devoe3-6, 6-7
2022-05-31vs SD 3.5 Moutain View/ Louis (3:2)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJunko Toda / Haruko Vajda vs Brandy Baray / Guadalupe Garcia7-5, 7-5
2022-05-24Won 10
W#1 SinglesJunko Toda vs Joan Fahrenthold6-0, 6-2
2022-05-17vs SD 3.5 Coronado TC/ Schmied (2:3)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJunko Toda / Haruko Vajda vs Christy Ward / Caroline Mickel6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMina Tsuya / Junko Toda vs Ciara Levine / ALEXIS MCCANDLESS6-4, 6-1
W#1 DoublesHaruko Vajda / Junko Toda vs Lisa Laulom / Hayley Connors0-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-04-26vs SD 3.5 Moutain View/ Louis (3:2)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJunko Toda / Haruko Vajda vs Elizabeth Ponce / Brandy Baray6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2022-04-12vs SD 3.5 SDTRC/ Monzon (3:2)Won 10
W#2 DoublesHaruko Vajda / Sakiko Tadokoro vs Lorena Monzon / Kristan Hanson6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Junko Toda
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
3.91
Maru Vega
published
3.72
3.71
HONG ZEMAN
published 4
3.60
Julie Wunderly
published 4
3.50
Haruko Vajda
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.43
Herta Ixtlahuac
published 3.5
3.39
Silvia Rodriguez
published
3.18
Mie Bennett
published
3.15
Cheryl Roche
published 3.5
3.03
Kelly Morgan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Wunderly + Junko Toda8456% games−0.7% vs expected
Haruko Vajda + Julie Wunderly5746% gamesnot enough data
Haruko Vajda + Junko Toda8457% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Roche + Kelly Morgan134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Junko Toda
246W–88L career · 7 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
4.09
Maru Vega
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%24%
3.91
4
Denysse Castaneda
8W–4L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
HONG ZEMAN
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Julie Wunderly
60W–58L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Haruko Vajda
165W–125L career · 5 lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.50
3.5
Herta Ixtlahuac
107W–70L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
3.43
Silvia Rodriguez
8W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
Mie Bennett
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Cheryl Roche
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Kelly Morgan
7W–19L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.