Teams

Green-Fuller

2025 UTA Fall Red Rocks Trio · 4.0M

5 players · average NTRP 3.75 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-20vs Orange-WhiteLost 03
L#1 DoublesTim Roelofs / Adam Jones vs Christian Thurgood / Quinten White3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDave Fuller vs Coby Stump3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesArmando Landauro vs Dylan St. Clair6-7, 2-6
2025-10-14vs Maroon-SoffeSplit 11
L#1 SinglesEric Dill vs Nathan Smith0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesDave Fuller vs Mat Beatty7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2025-10-02vs Purple-BosLost 12
L#1 DoublesAdam Jones / Tim Roelofs vs Logan Wrigley / Carl Neve3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesDave Fuller vs Hayden Bos7-5, 6-1
L#2 SinglesArmando Landauro vs Andrei Romanchenko4-6, 1-6
2025-09-27vs Blue-AldredLost 03
L#1 DoublesTim Roelofs / Adam Jones vs Tyler Howard / Max Austin0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesEric Dill vs Brock Aldred0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesArmando Landauro vs Lj John Aldred5-7, 2-6
2025-09-18vs Black-ForrestLost 12
W#1 DoublesMatthew Pilgrim / Tim Roelofs vs Duane Friedlund / William Hawkins6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesEric Dill vs Kent Jones3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesArmando Landauro vs Tyler Davis1-6, 2-6
2025-09-11vs Orange-WhiteLost 03
L#1 DoublesTim Roelofs / Matthew Pilgrim vs Christian Thurgood / Quinten White1-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesDave Fuller vs Coby Stump6-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesArmando Landauro vs Dylan St. Clair5-7, 2-6
2025-09-04vs Maroon-SoffeLost 03
L#1 DoublesAdam Jones / Tim Roelofs vs Clintone Hansen / Justin Pfeifer1-6, 2-2
L#1 SinglesDave Fuller vs Nathan Smith4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesArmando Landauro vs Mat Beatty3-5
2025-08-28vs Purple-BosLost 03
L#1 DoublesMatthew Pilgrim / Tim Roelofs vs Hayden Bos / Logan Wrigley2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDave Fuller vs Andrei Romanchenko4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesArmando Landauro vs JOSH KINGER2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 4.0M
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Orange-White7118617168
2Purple-Bos7116819183
3Blue-Aldred6218615151
4Black-Forrest2691531223
5Maroon-Soffe1771735237
6Green-Fuller1742041270

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Dave Fuller
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4
Armando Landauro
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Eric Dill
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Matthew Pilgrim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tim Roelofs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Roelofs + Matthew Pilgrim123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dave Fuller
2W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Armando Landauro
0W–7L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Eric Dill
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Pilgrim
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tim Roelofs
1W–6L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.