Teams

Hebner

2025 MIXED 18 & OVER EARLY START · 7.0 MX (SUN)

8 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-12-08vs Nasrabadi: Mr. & Miss HitsLost 01
L#3 DoublesJustin Hebner / Laine Weinberg vs Austin Choe / Charlyn Francisco1-6, 0-6
2024-11-24vs Douville - Having a CoupleLost 01
L#3 DoublesLaine Weinberg / Justin Hebner vs Elizabeth Olig / Cameron Olig2-6, 0-6
2024-11-17Won 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Christie / Jordan Darley vs Theresa Anderson / Carter Anderson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-11-10vs Steiniger/Kroening 7.0MX ESWon 10
W#1 DoublesJordan Darley / Jennifer Christie vs EDLYN KROENING / Nicholas Kroening6-4, 7-5
2024-11-03vs Eliason/Stern-Double the FunLost 01
L#1 DoublesNandan Raghavan / Jennifer Christie vs Kristin Lambrecht / Rick Johnston5-7, 4-6
2024-10-27vs Homsey 7.0 ESLost 01
L#1 DoublesJordan Darley / Laine Weinberg vs Chuck Tatsuda / Roberta Gibbons4-6, 5-7
2024-10-20vs Hultman/Ledray: Racq PackLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaine Weinberg / Craig Williams vs John Genz / Verena van Fleet1-6, 1-6
2024-10-13vs Nasrabadi: Mr. & Miss HitsLost 01
L#1 DoublesNandan Raghavan / Jennifer Christie vs Walter Truong / Megan Murray-Bennett2-6, 2-6
2024-10-06vs Douville - Having a CoupleLost 01
L#2 DoublesJordan Darley / Laine Weinberg vs John Mueller / Kimberly Mueller2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MX (SUN) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Angela Summers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Jennifer Christie
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
3.36
Richard Weinberg
published
3.25
Nandan Raghavan
published
3.23
Joanna Hider
published
3.17
Amy Rich
published 3.5
3.16
Laine Weinberg
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.14
Elizabeth Hebner
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Weinberg + Amy Rich3443% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angela Summers
29W–55L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
Jennifer Christie
72W–53L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
Richard Weinberg
15W–25L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.36
Nandan Raghavan
14W–16L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Joanna Hider
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Amy Rich
15W–54L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
Laine Weinberg
35W–53L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Elizabeth Hebner
9W–19L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.