Teams

MC BLUE

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

6 players · average NTRP 2.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-02vs NJ PINKWon 20
W#1 DoublesSamantha Spiwak / Kelly Wilson vs Marcie Carvalho / Denise Rivas6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMeghan Ciacci vs Kate Swift6-4, 6-3
2022-06-01vs HIW GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesKelly Wilson / Meghan Ciacci vs Brenda Park / Elan Lantz6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSamantha Spiwak vs Carrie DiCanio6-1, 6-3
2022-05-22vs BP REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesSamantha Spiwak / Karen Bent vs Angela Martin / Kelly Zander3-6, 2-6
2022-05-18vs NJ GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesSamantha Spiwak / Meghan Ciacci vs Laura Kelly / Nina Miranda1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-05-11vs RHCC BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaren Bent / Samantha Spiwak vs Cheryl Crawford / Lana Mendonca1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMeghan Ciacci vs Abbey Wood3-6, 1-6
2022-04-27vs HIW GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesMeghan Ciacci / Karen Bent vs Brenda Park / Michelle Jones6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Sengenberger / Tara Cronin vs Ashley Bacchiarello / Julie Benson6-2, 6-1
2022-04-20vs NJ PINKWon 30
W#1 DoublesSamantha Spiwak / Kelly Wilson vs Marcie Carvalho / Katy Thompson6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesMeghan Ciacci vs Bo Goldstein6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Bent / Tara Cronin vs Kate Swift / KAREN MADACSI6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.29 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Meghan Ciacci
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.27
Tara Cronin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.24
Karen Bent
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.15
Samantha Spiwak
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 2.5
1.98
Kelly Sengenberger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Laura Frei
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Samantha Spiwak + Karen Bent131152% games+8.1% vs expected
Tara Cronin + Kelly Sengenberger141349% games+0.9% vs expected
Karen Bent + Kelly Sengenberger21332% games−7.7% vs expected
Karen Bent + Meghan Ciacci3265% gamesnot enough data
Samantha Spiwak + Kelly Sengenberger044 matchesnot enough data
Karen Bent + Tara Cronin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Meghan Ciacci
72W–55L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Tara Cronin
31W–38L career · 2 lines in 2022
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Karen Bent
47W–86L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%98%2%
2.24
2.5
Samantha Spiwak
45W–54L career · 6 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.15
2.5
Kelly Sengenberger
21W–83L career · 1 line in 2022
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Laura Frei
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.