Teams

Ambrose/Knoxville

2026 Adult 18 & Over-Knoxville · 3.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-24Won 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Hoffman / Mike Mansoor vs Jacob Sutton / Jeff Gross6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDaniel Lyngh vs Yufei Wu6-1
2026-05-24vs JuMpArOuNdLost 01
L#1 SinglesTrey Ambrose vs Jordan Rockwell2-6, 4-6
2026-05-17vs Parks/KnoxvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesAJ Duhaime / Matthew Huddleston vs Andy Crook / Zachary Berning3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesWojciech Wiktor / Heath Mckeehan vs Darren Welch / Nicholas Panella2-6, 5-7
2026-04-19vs Thompson/KnoxvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesHeath Mckeehan / Wojciech Wiktor vs Jeff Gross / Michael Amerlan4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDaniel Lyngh vs Vino Wang7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Hoffman / Juan Manuel Urquiza vs Jeff Pewitt / Thomas Flores4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-18vs JuMpArOuNdWon 10
W#1 DoublesTrey Ambrose / Arthur Reid vs Zachary Jumper / Jeff Sullivan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-12vs Parks/KnoxvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesJuan Manuel Urquiza / Jawad Sheikh vs Wilson Hammond / Joe Michalik3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesDaniel Lyngh vs Zachary Berning2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Huddleston / Wade Milam vs Todd Blowers / Daniel Park4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAJ Duhaime vs Sam Winston1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesZakir Shaikh / Ryan Miller vs Andy Crook / Darren Welch6-3, 7-6
2026-03-22vs Thompson/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesZakir Shaikh / Daniel Lyngh vs Thomas Flores / Jeff Pewitt6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMike Mansoor / Jawad Sheikh vs Sam Bruce / Yufei Wu6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMatthew Huddleston / Elijah Abel vs Jacob Sutton / Michael Amerlan4-6, 6-7
2026-03-15vs Parks/KnoxvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesWojciech Wiktor / Elijah Abel vs Brandon Parks / Jay Moneyhun3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDaniel Lyngh / Wade Milam vs Joe Michalik / Wilson Hammond6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMatthew Huddleston / Juan Manuel Urquiza vs Andy Crook / Nicholas Panella7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Trey Ambrose
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Wade Milam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Daniel Lyngh
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.98
Mike Mansoor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Elijah Abel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.80
Wojciech Wiktor
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Jawad Sheikh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
AJ Duhaime
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.73
Juan Manuel Urquiza
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Zakir Shaikh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.48
Matthew Huddleston
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zakir Shaikh + Jawad Sheikh4252% games+11.4% vs expected
Wojciech Wiktor + Jawad Sheikh224 matchesnot enough data
Mike Mansoor + Jawad Sheikh314 matchesnot enough data
Mike Mansoor + Zakir Shaikh123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Trey Ambrose
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.98
Wade Milam
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.27
3
Daniel Lyngh
22W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
Mike Mansoor
31W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Elijah Abel
5W–12L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
Wojciech Wiktor
9W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
Jawad Sheikh
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
AJ Duhaime
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Juan Manuel Urquiza
8W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Zakir Shaikh
22W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.71
Matthew Huddleston
4W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.